3rd Dimension And It's Consciousness

Written by Mathew Naismith

I created the following image format just recently, this format of course makes it difficult for my  readers from various other countries to translate, I have therefore decided to share this image in a written document format. I am also going to elaborate on what is stated here.

The lab or laboratory refers to the 3rd dimension, this universe, and the experiment itself refers to the consciousness used within the lab. This however isn't referring that we are being experimented on by a so called higher consciousness, it means we have become apart of the experiment itself to the extent of becoming primarily of 3rd dimensional consciousness. All this means is we have become so involved and attached to the 3rd dimension, that we have forgotten the consciousness that created the lab in the first place.             

 ____________________________

Nothing within a 3rd dimension has been created from a 3rd dimensional consciousness. All of what is of the 3rd dimension, was created from other dimension, this is because the 3rd dimension is limited to a certain consciousness.

The 3rd dimension is like a science experiment conducted in a lab, the 3rd dimension is the lab while the experiment itself represents the consciousness used in relation to the lab.

The 3rd dimensional lab determines what is discovered and created from these discoveries but the consciousness used is of other dimensions, albeit in a limited way in accordance with the 3rd dimensional lab.

This is not easy to properly comprehend for various reasons, one being the primary use of 3rd dimensional consciousness. The lab might be 3rd dimensional but the consciousness isn't, not unless the consciousness used is limited to the lab itself.

~Mathew G~

____________________________

This is certainly a different way to look at our existence, there is however no right or wrong way of perceiving our existence for consciousness itself is unlimited, only created consciousness's like 3rd dimensional consciousness is limited. This limitation of course gives us a different perception of an existence as each limitation does, however, because we are conditioned to a consciousness of the 3rd dimension, that is how we perceive, any other perception beyond these limitations is usually incomprehensible to us.

The following is a good thing to be aware of. I'm usually accused of being argumentative in dissuasions, the reason lies entirely on how many ways I can perceive one perspective, basically people like me tend to have a reasonable answer for almost anything, this infuriates people who are unable to perceive in the same way. A good example of this is, anyone who can only primarily perceive through 3rd dimensional consciousness, will of course perceive discussions as an arguments when in discussion with a person who can perceive beyond 3rd dimensional consciousness. Arguments of course being primarily of 3rd dimensional perspectives. If you are able to perceive beyond 3rd dimensional consciousness, you will most likely find it difficult to discus anything remotely insightful and in-depth with anyone who primarily perceives in 3rd dimensional perspectives. It's wise to keep the discussion content to a 3rd dimensional aspect. I'm obviously not very wise, this is obvious!! :)

There is also a reversal or a calibration when conducting in a discussion with people who can perceive beyond 3rd dimensional limitations as yourself, each giving a different view/perception of a singular perspective. Now this is interesting, I have had numerous discussions with Eastern minded people, only on one occasion did the discussion, to some extent, get to an argumentative stage. At no times was I personally attacked or called names when in total disagreement. I however have personally experienced that Western minded people are the opposite, even when the discussion isn't an argument, they call the discussion an argument or cause it to be an argument.

The question is, are Eastern minded people conditioned to think beyond 3rd dimensional consciousness more than Western minded people? It would seem that Eastern teachings teach about a consciousness beyond 3rd dimensional consciousness, where's western thinking seems to be based more on 3rd dimensional consciousness.  This assumption isn't just based on Western minded people turning a discussion into an argument, even when their is no argument to begin with, this assumption is also based on various spiritual teachings of Eastern cultures. There is also a very good reason why so many Western spiritually aware people most often turn to Eastern philosophy and spiritual practices, yoga is a  good example and so is meditation to start with.

You will also find a lot of the ancient Western philosophies and practises were more based on other dimensional consciousness's than the 3rd dimension, this is by no mistake. The laboratory (3rd dimension) didn't dictate the consciousness being used within this 3rd dimensional laboratory in ancient times, consciousness's from various dimension were utilised. In the West, we now primarily use 3rd dimensional consciousness within this laboratory, this of course limits our perspectives and the various perceptions of these perspectives to 3rd dimensional aspects. Sadly, the East is also being influenced by 3rd dimensional consciousness which is primarily of the finite, not the infinite.

This way of looking at our existence has nothing to do with absolute truths, it does however have something to do with perceiving beyond 3rd dimensional aspects and perceptions, this is all. To me, it's wise to be aware of the consciousness we use in our experimentations in a 3rd dimensional laboratory/reality.      

The Implications of Illusions

Written by Mathew Naismith

This post isn't for the faint hearted, basically meaning, anyone desiring to stay unaware of our true nature, won't want to comprehend of what their true nature is in fear of losing their identity. Human consciousness of course being based on identity, to intensify oneself as something and anything from perceiving being of nothing. In actuality, we are everything but nothing, of course human consciousness only desires to be of everything that is appealing to it and nothing that isn't appealing to it. Not sure where a true sense of oneness is in this concept/perception though!!

Now I was given a link to a video in response to a reply I gave in reply to a reply in regards to my last post, We Are Not The Soul. I don't comply to everything that is stated in this video but I did relate to certain parts of the content of this video as my following reply to the sender of this video will show. The video in question often refers to Earth being a prison and hell and that everything created is an illusion, I of course don't comply to this as a whole but I do in parts. You see to comply to the existence of an illusion, is being apart of the illusion to begin with, it's basically complying to an illusion of an illusion of an illusion but are we entrapped/imprisoned within illusions?  

Are we imprisoned by a higher consciousness as the video states? No, not by a higher consciousness than ourselves because there isn't one but yes, if we think there is a higher consciousness than ourselves. This clearly implies that we have indeed imprisoned ourselves, the illusion being created by us. The illusion and imprisonment is only real because it's been created by us. The question now is, is there a higher power? Yes, a created one when all we think all we are is human consciousness.

Before I go on, I will insert the video in question and the subsequent replies.        

_____________________________

REPLY

How curious. Look at this segment of a video. Where an immortal spirit describes motionless state of consciousness. It's very similar. The Original MMORPG  https://youtu.be/dEK89-nPyU4?t=3h47m36s

My Reply

Well my friend, thank you for sharing this with me, insightful. I don't usually respond to human perceptions and knowing, it's too much a part of the illusion for me. This is why I am not well liked on the net in regards to spiritually aware people, they want to continue in their ignorance, basically, they are entrapped within their own ignorance.

Illusion; it's only an illusion if we desire to stay ignorant to everything being created otherwise everything created isn't an illusion, it's real because of what it's created from and through. The illusion is believing in the illusion  itself, even stating it's all an illusion is being apart of the illusion, this is one of the created traps.

The reason I like Eastern perceptions, is a lot of it is based on the perception and perspective of balance, balance allowing one to exist within an illusion without becoming the illusion itself.

Boredom; this hits the nail right on the head, anything pertaining to the soul in some way, becomes bored. Boredom again is an illusion because of what it creates and what it creates is illusions, any kind of consciousness that can become bored, has become apart of the illusion, this motion of boredom however is deliberate as well.

_____________________________

We couldn't exist or experience certain conscious realities without being in ignorance, the human experience takes a lot of ignorance to experience such a consciousness. We however need to be aware that only in ignorance can a consciousness destroy, no truly aware consciousness is able to be destructive in any sense. In this case, all it takes to become less destructive is awareness, the awareness that we are deliberately expressing ignorance to have a human experience.       

Before I go on, it's often said that many of my perceptions are based on Buddhism, in actuality, a lot of my perceptions mimic Hinduism and Taoism as well. Being that Buddhism and Taoism can coexist under Hinduism, it's understandable why my perceptions are so vast and varied, in actuality, I have never studied in Buddhism, Hinduism or Taoism.

The video often refers to many God's/Goddess's while refuting the claim of one God, are there many God's and Goddess's or is there one God?

Lets look at the perception of oneness to answer this, oneness refers to one as in one consciousness, one God, however, what is created from this consciousness is only expressed as parts of this one consciousness. Some of these parts do have a better comprehension of their truer being than other parts of this consciousness. Any consciousness that is less aware of this, will often perceive a consciousness that is more aware (powerful) as a God or Goddess. These God's and Goddess's are creator in their own right but so are human being albeit to a far lesser extent.

What creates a God or Goddess is a lesser aware consciousness and quite understandably so. Now the perception of oneness tells us there is only one true God, one consciousness, however,  if consciousness as a whole was aware of it's true self, what then would define a God? In actuality, the question for or against there being a God or God's and Goddess's is irrelevant, all we need to understand is that all consciousness is creative in it's own right. Once again this all comes down to perceiving in levels or not, the question is now, is perceiving in levels the creator of illusions?                        

The video often referred to a higher consciousness, meaning, a higher level of consciousness. This basically refers to the concept of God's and Goddess's, they do exist only because of a consciousness only being able to perceive in levels, being that there has to be a higher consciousness. The existence of a higher and lower consciousness indeed exists as of anything created from this one consciousness, however, this one consciousness can be or not be perceived as a God, either perception is correct and incorrect at the same time. This perception is based on what kind of consciousness one is experiencing at any given time. It's wise to be aware that when perceiving by levels, everything created from this one consciousness is going to be perceived as a higher consciousness in some way, this isn't the only perception one can take. This one consciousness is unable to see itself as a God when it's of everything. If you were everything, including the illusions, what then would define a God?

One creative consciousness exists as does many creative consciousness's, it matters not what level a consciousness creates from until a consciousness perceives in levels. The perception of a God or God's and Goddess's, is purely based on the perception of levels of what a consciousness creates. A creative consciousness exists as does many consciousness's, what then defines on what level these consciousness's are on? The perception of levels of course. Don't get me wrong here though, these levels exist because they have been created to create in their own right.

I will put it this way, this one creative consciousness has created numerous creative consciousness as these numerous creative consciousness have created this one consciousness. This is also the case of illusion and non-illusions!!

Can yin exist without the yang, can the yang exist without the yin?

We Are Not The Soul

Written by Mathew Naismith

It's incredible becoming aware of the difference between each person or groups of people, not just at the human level but at the soul level as well, in actuality, there is more of a difference between consciousness's at the soul level than at the human level. Yes, to certain groups of souls, levels exist within human consciousness and soul consciousness, however, to certain groups of souls who are aware they are not the soul, levels can only exist within consciousness's that believe they are the soul consciousness or even human consciousness. This means these souls can comprehend vast amounts of perceptions because there consciousness is not limited to levels.

Levels and Ego: How many people believe that souls and humans, have to go through various conscious levels to become aware, it's like we start off at the first level infancy, then go onto childhood and then adolescence and finally adulthood. Each stage is awareness building. Souls to a lot of people work in a simular fashion, what is above is also below, however the concept of what is above is also below isn't the case when a soul is able to perceive beyond these levels.

The reason for this entirely lies in how the soul perceives. Imagine for one moment if we are aware of being aware that we are, from the start, of this creative consciousness, God's consciousness or of the collective consciousness as a whole or what ever you want to call it. Any soul that can perceive this, will obviously be able to perceive beyond these levels we limit ourselves to. Now imagine how hard it is for certain souls to comprehend this or even want to comprehend this, certain souls just don't want to comprehend perceiving beyond levels for a very good reason.

A point to be made here; how many children today express a more mature wiser expression without going through various level of experience? One reason for this lays in how children today are allowed to freely express themselves without having to go through various levels to do so. Perceiving in levels are obviously limiting, we need to realise this.    

I know there are a lot of people who will totally disagree with me when I say that the soul is ego, there are  people who even believe that the soul doesn't have an ego period. No person who doesn't, in some way, want to comprehend a lot of what I write about, won't like what I write. Once again, this is for a very good reason.

A lot of people also firmly believe that all souls have to go through these levels to evolve and become more aware through each level of experience, it's sort of likened to maturing from a immature unaware state to a more mature aware state. This isn't the case for all souls, some souls choose to go through these levels one by one and other don't. We then might presume that any soul that chooses to go through these levels, is controlled by the ego to do so, being that its the ego that wants to go through these levels when it clearly doesn't have to.

The soul can be controlled by the ego but it's not the controlling ego that chooses to experience existences level by level, could you imagine a controlling ego wanting to go from level to level when it can have it all in an instance void of levels!! The soul chooses to experience this kind of existence or not because one kind of existence isn't more worthy to experience than the another, all experiences are worthy at the soul level for certain souls but not all souls see that all existences are worthy, this too is a part of the experience. However, all existences are worthy at the God like level of consciousness, a state of consciousness where levels just don't exist, basically, the God like consciousness being of the consciousness of collective consciousness as a whole. Imagine a consciousness with no levels to give a consciousness judgment period!!

True Writing: What I mostly write about isn't for the souls who chose to exist by levels, basically, my writings are really only for those souls who are able to comprehend perceptions beyond these levels. At no point do I want to try to convince souls, existing by levels, that they don't have to experience existences through levels, in actuality, no soul that is primarily existing by levels, are able or have the desire to comprehend my writings, they shouldn't even try, especially at the human level of understanding.

However, there is a reason why people like me turn up when the shit hits the fan, meaning, when human consciousness becomes too destructive. Basically, we try to put balance back into a consciousness, a prime example of this was in ancient Egypt. We are not here to force balance, we are here to encourage balance and wisdom, however, if the collective human consciousness chooses otherwise, so be it because as I said, no existence is more worthy than another, just maybe a little wiser way to go at times.

It is important what we reflect especially in how we express ourselves through writing for instance. We must write true to ourselves, meaning, we must write for ourselves, not for other people because being true makes all the difference. We might think how can people like me bring balance when we don't attract the people who need that balance most of all!! If we are true in what we write, our expressions will reflect this trueness onto the collective consciousness bringing it balance, however like I said, if the collective consciousness chooses to ignore this in the end, so be it.

The way we express love is vitally important as well, at the moment love is being over used and abused in a simular fashion to religion at times. So often have I discover that the love that some people express is fake, especially unconditional love. Often this so called unconditional love, has more conditions attached to it, not less. It's vitally important to be true to bring balance into a consciousness, I cannot express this enough.           

So in all, is it important that we become aware we are not the soul but of the soul? Not for everyone, we must go along with what the soul path and journey is but at the same time realising that the soul might need to be balanced as well to create a balanced reality. We are not our soul but we are of the soul, realising this helps bring balance back to the human and soul consciousness. Any true sense of balance and trueness, especially in our own expressions, naturally creates peace and harmony, and yes love, however,  true sense of love only comes from a true sense of expression, this is the same with all of what we express. In the age of false prophets/people. Try to be as true to yourself as possible, this is all you need to do.......    

Their Return - Taking Responsibility

Written by Mathew Naismith

It's occurred before, they returned and found that the children have been very naughty and destructive so they packed up the naughty children's toys and sent the children to a place of self-reproach. When a consciousness becomes overly destructive of their own and everybody else's toys, a more aware and wiser consciousness naturally takes responsible action. These toys are in reference to the universe and Earth itself and human consciousness.

This post is about how human consciousness is seen by a much more aware and wiser consciousness in the same context as we see infant, child and adolescence stages of human existence. Basically, human consciousness is seen as a conscious state that isn't mature. I was going to write about this topic when, synchronistically, I received a response to my last post. The post seemed to reflect on human conscious immaturity, yes, human consciousness is seen as being an immature state of consciousness but how irresponsible can an immature consciousness be at times? I think the present motion of human consciousness answers this question, however, this immaturity is a part of the growing process for humans but as a consciousness, immaturity is a part of the evolution of a consciousness, however...

I will now go to the responses I received in relation to my last post and my follow up replies. I have found it's always wise to include other peoples perceptions to get a better understanding.    

___________________________

Reply to my last post:

A lot of the basics, the underlying bits, are the same throughout time. As to "people like Matt" doing or not doing wrong, I personally pay no attention. I am not responsible for anyone's journey but my own. At the end of the day I am totally indifferent to such things, it's like I said if you are looking. Me? I'm just not. I'm fine with my many dimensions just the way they are ;)

My Reply:

I'm not sure if you are into the concepts of oneness or not, if your not, consider this, we are all on the same human journey while taking different paths within this (one) journey.

Now, are all humans responsible for each others paths? The answer is of course no, however, should all humans be responsible for the human journey itself? The answer is yes, once a consciousness becomes irresponsible within the journey itself, it becomes chaotic and destructive. We are responsible for the journey itself as a whole, anything else is irresponsible.

Multinationals/politicians and religion have often reflected an irresponsible motion towards the journey itself, there not responsible for others so they use them as sheep. Stating that we are not responsible for the journey itself, is cause for concern.

Matt's path is to market he's kind of path, when does Matt's path stop being an individual path and become the journey that we are all walking? Look at it this way BE, when a politician is noticeably hurting the country he is supped to be responsible for, we are not supposed to be responsible for his actions and vote him out of office!! It would be irresponsible, not just to ourselves, but everybody else if we didn't take responsibility for his path which he has made apart of the collective journey.

Oneness, we are responsible for this oneness for it's a collective. Once an individual path becomes influential upon the collective journey, it's our responsibility to correct this, the present state of human consciousness clearly shows a lack of irresponsibility for the collective journey.

Sorry BE, I'm for being responsible for only in our irresponsibility to each other can we create such a chaotic destructive reality. It's a collective journey BE, not an individual journey that we take no responsibility for.......

Reply

I have been on an awakened path since the mid to late 70's. I have seen much, learned much, experienced much and have lifetimes to keep doing so.

You really needn't explain, I understand. If you were to read my writings you would see many references to spirituality not being a thing one can buy and sell....among other topics of a similar nature.

I appreciate your time and your blog, thanks for your insight.

            

___________________________

I didn't reply to this reply from BE but I did reply to another reply from BE which gave me a better comprehension of where BE was coming from, from the start. The following exchange took place between BE and myself.

___________________________

Reply

I think it was easier prior to the internet to obtain accurate information. These days there's just too much information and much of it is MISinformation and the really sad part is that so many folks have gotten to the point where they don't care if it is information or misinformation so long as they agree with it.

I feel very blessed to know how to really dig in when doing research, it's like a treasure hunt for information, lol

MY REPLY

Agreed, if you are aware of what you are searching for on the net, the nets great, if not, the nets a nightmare to finding the real truth, not just a perceived truth.

In such a chaotic reality, people want to believe what they desire to believe, not what actually is. A lot of science experiments are also conducted like this these days sadly enough, the age of false prophets, what can I say.

Human consciousness is an immature consciousness and always will be an immature consciousness, this is likened to a child's consciousness that is immature and unaware. A child's consciousness will always be immature as of the same of human consciousness, we can't change that but we can evolve from that immaturity I believe.

___________________________

Human consciousness is seen to be immature by more aware and wise consciousness's than human consciousness, basically, consciousness's that are mature in nature, more developed if you like. This might seem I am talking about levels here, you have infancy, childhood, adolescence and adulthood, but each state of consciousness stays as it is, only the consciousness having the experience will evolve or not from these states of consciousness, this is of human consciousness as it is of consciousness as a whole. What is above is also below, not in perspectives but in concept/expression/motion. An immature consciousness perceives these as levels, a more mature consciousness perceives these as states of consciousness. Put in a different way, a mature consciousness doesn't see our human growth from infancy to adulthood as levels, they are perceived as states of consciousness.

Now for an explanation of their return. The return is making reference to a more mature consciousness taking responsibility for an obvious irresponsible consciousness, a human consciousness in this case. Mature consciousness's in the past were often deemed something in reference to God's and Goddess's, more aware and wiser consciousness's to human consciousness. Basically in this post, I'm talking about the return of these God's and Goddess's, a mature consciousness as opposed to our obvious immature human consciousness......

Getting Out There Spiritually

Written by Mathew Naismith

I recently came across a person, of the name of Matt Kahn, that so many people seem to be presently raving about, this person seems to be the flavour of the moment and justifiably so. Matt, within the following video, seems to be speaking of the aspects I have for so long been expressing myself, there is however a fundamental difference between people like Matt and myself, even though I know about marketing, I don't market myself, basically, I tell it how it is without the gloss and glitter. This is one of the traits of a mystic, a true mystic will never market themselves, they can't.

Think on this, did Buddha or Jesus market themselves in this same way? Well, they didn't need to for a very good reason but there is a very good reason, other than financial benefits, why many spiritually ware people need to market themselves to attract a wider audience, unlike people like myself. Because we are used to be entertained so much, highly stimulated, we will often ignore anything that isn't highly stimulating, Matt uses numerous marketing ploys including the correct body language to be noticed by a larger audience. Matt knows to be accepted today, you need to market yourself, it's the sign of the times, this is just the way we are.

The following video by Matt is in relation to feeling good now, it's very effective.              

  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eIx5iFNjj-0

Matt, in away, mentions about religion and how it should no longer serve a purpose in our lives, religion has played it's part in our 3rd dimensional evolution. Religion certainly served a purpose, it gave a mostly illiterate people a kind of an understanding of a consciousness beyond human conscious comprehension for the most part. Religion today still serves this same purpose for a lot of people even for a more literate society for a number of reasons, one being that human consciousness as a whole seems to have lost faith. Religion today still feels this void.

Matt also mentions about negatives and positives, focusing on the negatives as negatives, reinforces the negative, not the positive. How many of us are trying to avoid being negative or being around negative people? Within this motion, which Matt mentions about early on the video, we are in actuality reinforcing these judged negatives by enacting against these judged negatives with positives. As Matt mentions further on in the video, we will not see these same judged negatives as negatives but positives in the 5th dimension. The 5th dimension being the next conscious evolution from human 3rd dimensional consciousness.

Ego was also mentioned by Matt, never was the ego judged as just being negative by Matt, however, Matt did make reference to a dominating ego as opposed to an ego. I state controlling ego as opposed to Matt's dominating ego, it's basically the same thing.

Matt did use the word love a number of times, this is a very effective marketing ploy in relation to spirituality, this is the glitter where's the humour and appropriate body language is the gloss. The word love is too ambiguous for a mystic to use, especially on a regular basis, too many people relate love to pain for starters, however, because most western people haven't experienced excessive pain created from love, the word love used in the western society works quite well because it's still has a favourable and appealing vibes that indeed works for the benefit of the recipients. However, "Love thy neighbour', a statement by Jesus, how many married partners took this to it's full effect and what degree of emotional pain has this one kind of motion created?   

Matt also mentions about a right direction, to a mystic, there is no right or wrong direction, there are collective journeys taken with many individual paths to follow within a collective journey, that is all. No path or journey is a wrong or right direction to take, however, using the word right is once again very appealing to a lot of people, it's likened to the words positive and love. How often are these words used by spiritually aware people these days? These words used in the correct manner, have there purpose in numerous ways to great effect.

Of course Jesus used the word love but in regards to a 5th dimensional consciousness, within this consciousness, the word love isn't as ambiguous as it is in a 3rd dimensional consciousness and neither are words like positive, negative or right and wrong. In actuality, the word love will actually be used less, not more in a 5th dimensional consciousness, the reason being is that love will be just known without having to be put into motion. Also, a 5th dimensional consciousness won't need to put love into motion as there will be no necessity to do so, this is due to the absence of chaos as we know it in the 3rd dimensional consciousness, there will be nothing to quell.

It's sad we have gotten to a state that we have to use various marketing techniques to attract a larger audience unlike Jesus and Buddha for example. People who are mystic in nature will today still conduct themselves as people like Jesus and Buddha did, however, this sadly excludes the larger audience that people like Matt Kahn attract. People like Matt are a must today, this is very evident.

People like myself are also not attracted, or more precisely, have no need to be stimulated to listen and learn, in actuality, we like it to be expressed in the way it truly is, not in the way we desire it to be expressed, there is a big difference here. Now the reason we don't need to be stimulated, is that we don't judge this reality in being just bad or negative, good or positive, we often avoid these labels as they are again ambiguous at the best of times. What is judged as being positive or negative by one person, can be judged the complete opposite by another persons. This is likened to telling a people of one culture they are wrong within there culture at the same time stating how right their culture is, this is an expression of a extreme ambiguous judgement.

        

It is natural for a consciousness, existing in a chaotic destructive existence, to be attracted to gloss and glitter, basically, it's natural for a consciousness to try to escape this kind of reality whenever possible in this kind of 3rd dimensional conscious reality. It is also obvious a fifth dimensional consciousness will in actuality deliberately put themselves into a 3rd dimensional consciousness, destructive or not, because this kind of consciousness doesn't judge, to the extremes like a 3rd dimensional consciousness does. Jesus and Buddha are prime examples of this. Don't get me wrong here, I'm not stating that Jesus and Buddha are just of the 5th dimension, it's just they expressed themselves through a 5th dimensional consciousness to probably help condition us to a 5th dimensional existence, an existence void of gloss and glitter.

Does this mean we shouldn't listen to all this gloss and glitter?

Not at all, 3rd dimensional consciousness's needs this gloss and glitter to be able to comprehend 5th dimensional consciousness to start with, especially in a reality that is hell bent on self-destruction. This is likened to religion telling us there is a more aware consciousness than human consciousness, it's part of a natural and necessary process a consciousness takes to evolve. However, like the way we have abused religion, we can also abuse this new age gloss and glitter, "but another new be and end all". How many of us can't get enough of this new age gloss and glitter, especially in western society? How many of these people then judge what is and isn't negative and positive to an extreme at times? Like Matt stated in the video, within this reaction, all we are doing is reinforcing the judged negatives within this motion!!

A good telltale sign to a true comprehension of 5th dimensional consciousness, is once a consciousness is no longer attracted to this gloss and glitter, such a consciousness is well and truly on it's way to truly comprehending 5th dimensional consciousness, after all, 5th dimensional consciousness isn't about gloss and glitter but a truer sense of balance as opposed to extremes.  

The Universe - An Abstract Expression

Written by Mathew Naismith

Before we get into this, it has been asked a number of times where I fit into the scheme of things, what human label do I fall under, my usual reply is that I am spiritually aware to some extent. It would seem I actually fall under the label mystic more than anything as I seem to fit this profile, I was also very heavily involved in mysticism in ancient Egypt in a past life, not long before hieroglyphs depicted light globes and helicopters on the walls of Hathor's temple.

Mysticism to me is like modern day science in that it's about becoming more aware, however, unlike modern day science, mysticism is void of any perceptions that are limiting, the following post is a prime example of this. I am also about the consciousness of mysticism, not the mechanics of mysticism, this basically means I avoid primarily using physical means to obtain an awareness. This is done for a very good reason, the five senses usually limits and hinders conscious awareness.

Now for the universe being but an abstract expression (representation). Firstly, what does this abstract universe represent?

Abstract Universe: This abstract universe represents a consciousness that everything else in existence has been created from, including other consciousness's. We often refer to this consciousness as the source of all creation or God for example, basically once again it's in reference to a consciousness that everything else has been created from, it's truly important to  comprehend this. To me, it's quite understandable why we relate this kind of consciousness to a God.

The abstract representation of this all creative consciousness, could be deemed as an illusion and often is by many, being that this all creative consciousness is real and where everything else has been abstractly copied from and only in part. To explain this better abstract art for instance is a reflection or an expression of parts of a something, this refers that the universe is but one of infinite expressions of this one consciousness.

Abstract art represents certain expressions while other expressions are ignored or not included within an expression (art). This exclusion of other parts changes the reflection of what is being expressed, you might even say this exclusion distorts what is real, however, as of consciousness, this distortion gives a different perspective to what is being expressed which produces a different perception that would otherwise be unknown.

What is real =  infinite + timelessness + reality

What is abstract = finite +time + illusion

Abstract expressions seems to distort reality, basically, giving a false representation of what is real, an illusion of what is real, however, in actually abstract expressions are not about giving a false representation of what is real, instead abstract expressions are about giving a different perspective of what is real while still representing, in part, what is real. What usually occurs is that a consciousness believes or wants to believe that this abstract universe is real in every sense, basically, we have fooled ourselves in believing in an abstract representation being a true representation of who we are as a whole. We have, within ourselves, created an illusion through our beliefs, basically, this abstract universe isn't giving us a false representation of this all creative consciousness, we are.

It's truly this simple, what is real is of the infinite, what isn't real is of the finite, all that time does is give this all creative consciousness a state of existence where the infinite consciousness can be expressed as a finite consciousness. Because the infinite is expressed in time, time can only express the infinite in parts, this automatically gives an abstract impression of the infinite. Time expresses certain expressions while other expressions are excluded, this is because time is of starting and ending points, within time, a consciousness is unable to express a starting and ending point at the same time, they need to be separated or expressed in parts giving a abstract appearance or perception.

It's good to be aware that this abstract universe and everything in it, is based on a real reflection distorted by time, this doesn't make everything in time an illusion unless a consciousness believes that this state is real. How many of us believe that obstruct art is a true depiction of that is real? Not many of us, there is however one thing to be aware of here, most often abstract art will portray a real expression that most people are unaware of or can perceive, could not the universe itself also be doing the same? In timelessness (infinite) we are one thing, in time (finite) we are something else however in stating this, it's wise to be aware that the universe is an abstract copied image of who we truly are as a whole.

Basically, we are talking about two sides of the coin here or yin and yang. the abstract (finite) being the other side of the coin compared to this all creative consciousness.

Yin = abstract + finite

Yang = reality/actual + infinite

Two Sides of the Coin: There are a number of similarities between the two sides of the coin to consider here, yin and yang, finite and infinite. On one hand we have the all creative consciousness that created everything, on the other hand we have consciousness's that emulate this creative consciousness by creating in it's own right, basically once again, creating but in an abstract way. We also have two sides of the coin, however, they are still of the same coin. We might also think one is real and the other isn't, what then depicts real when there is no unreal and visa-versa? Put in another way, what depicts yang without the yin?  

We might think we are thinking too much here, why can't one exist without the other being present?

To think this still takes a thought process to begin with. The point is, the infinite is of timelessness, this also means time has also always existed within this timeless state, in other words the other side of the coin, yin, has also always existed for there is no starting or ending point within timelessness (infinite consciousness). Yin and yang, finite and infinite, time and timelessness, two sides of the coin, have always existed, however, in an abstract universe/reality, one seems to exist without the other. It's like I said about abstract art, usually the emphasis is on certain expressions while ignoring other expressions, this often seems to give a distorted impression of what is real, in actuality what is occurring is that the abstract is an expression of the other side of the coin. Basically, abstract expressions represent an ignorance of one side of the coin to emphasise the other side of the coin more to become aware of the flaws or perfections of the coin as a whole, in other words consciousness as a whole.

Is it possible to experience both side of the coin, meaning, is it possible to be expressive of the finite and the infinite at the same time?

Absolutely, this however takes a consciousness to be aware of both sides of the coin without judging what is worthy and what isn't worthy, in other words a reflection and expression of pure balance.

Now to throw a spanner in the works, meaning, to desist in one conscious perception to become aware of another conscious perception. This all creative consciousness (God) is not just of the infinite, it's also of the finite (the abstract), as it's not just of timelessness, it's also of time, this is why I often call this all creative consciousness pure balance. We so often refer to this creative consciousness as being of one side of the coin and not the other, basically, of yin without the yang but consider this, this creative consciousness doesn't just represent one side of the coin because it is the coin itself. This however doesn't mean that infinite consciousness (God) isn't of infinite consciousness, often when a consciousness is becoming aware of the other side of the coin, it will see this other side of the coin as being some kind of God, this is inevitable. The reason for this is simple, when a consciousness becomes aware of an awareness beyond it's comprehension, it either ignores this awareness or depicts it as a higher consciousness than of itself.

The abstract universe has fragmented consciousness to depict certain expressions of itself while ignoring other expressions, however within this process, consciousness can become highly destructive mainly because it's unaware or deliberately stays ignorant to the other side of the coin thus giving such a consciousness an imbalance way of existing. We can indeed correct this, not just by becoming of one side of the coin, finite or infinite consciousness, but by becoming the coin itself, consciousness as a whole......      

Using Love in a Balanced Way

Written by Mathew Naismith

Consciousness is likened to a pool of water, one drop of rain causes a ripple that is soon enveloped within the stillness of the pond, however, numerous drops of rain cause the pond to become chaotic as each ripple, caused by the drops of rain, fight against each other. Because of such turbulence, the pond then becomes murky.

Try to imagine human consciousness as a pond of water, to much of a good thing can cause an imbalance within the pond turning it murky. At present, I perceive human consciousness as being murky and it's becoming murkier. The reason for this stems from an imbalance of too much rain or not enough rain. To much of one thing applied in an imbalanced way, will cause the water (human consciousness) to become murky through  chaotic interactions and counteractions, this is likened to rain drops fighting against each other.

Pond = human consciousness

Water = love and light

Balance = harmony

Imbalance = chaos

It is obvious that any kind of counteraction will cause the pond (human consciousness) to become murkier, it is therefore obvious that any love used in an imbalanced way, will cause the pond to become murkier instead of clearer.

As we become spiritually aware, we feel we naturally become more of love and light, we then naturally feel human consciousness (the pond) couldn't get enough love and light, especially in relation (retaliation) to a chaotic reality. Psychologically all we have done is humanly responded to a chaotic situation in retaliation, this is a natural human psychological response in situations like this. I know there are spiritually aware people who don't think psychology belongs in spirituality but it does, used in the correct way, it quietens the mind. In actuality, any spiritual practice that quietens the mind, is a form of  psychology.       

How is the pond (human consciousness) going to respond to too much water (love and light) at a given time, especially when the pond is not structured to take this amount of water in the first place? Human consciousness (the pond) is unable to sustain or comprehend this amount of water (love and light), too much of an imbalance will cause more chaos, not less. Too much chaos will also cause the pond to become structured in a different way, we might think this is what we want but what if the pond (human consciousness) just became another muddy back water due to it's restructuring!!

When leaders of the world today get up and clearly state they are going to kill as many women and children as possible (Palestinians), which is also being supported by western countries, is this a sign the pond is clearing. What about western leaders clearly stating they would kill Jesus if he lived today, these kind of thoughts and actions are no longer being stated behind closed doors. These actions are certainly not a sign that the water is even starting to become clear, in actuality, it's a sign human consciousness is becoming a muddy back water. The reason for this is clear to people like myself, too many ripples upon the pond is turning the water of the pond murky.

Now let's again perceive human consciousness being a pond, what would occur if the pond was drizzled upon instead of rained upon? The ripples caused by the drizzle causes far less chaos upon the pond of water than rain, within this, there is a balance between the pond of water and the drizzle, drizzle of cause being a lot more passive and thoughtful of the pond of water (human consciousness) than rain. This is the point, balance between the pond (humans consciousness) and the water (love and light) but this is clearly not occurring at present manly because we are still in a retaliative mode of thought and reasoning.

If we look at the pond (human consciousness), it is full of water (love and light), this is different to a pond full of mud (love and dark). It's very hard becoming aware in mud but a lot easier in a clear pond of water...Mathew G

We might think I should have stated hate and dark instead of love and dark, not at all, this is due to many people also passionately love to kill, love war and conflicts, love to hurt and cause pain with the same passion than any other kind of expression of love. We can deny this as much as we like but this denial won't help us make the pond water clear again, no kind of an unawareness or blatant ignorance will.  

I must be a horrid person stating all this and yes, I have been  judged by many as something unbecoming in some way, especially in relation or comparison to themselves.

A couple of days ago I saw a lass (female) that I know get into her car with her dog outside of my house, I immediately got my life size toy dog and went outside to wave my friend off using the paw of my toy dog to do so. I am a fifty two year old bloke with no  inhibitions, this is quite obvious to all my friends. The other day one of my wife's friends asked my wife if I was drunk because I was acting without inhibitions. When I lived in a small town, a lot of the town folk thought I was taking some kind of drug as I was mostly always cheerful and happy. This is who I am even though my writings may be misconstrued, sometimes deliberately, to portray me as some kind of monster or demeaning entity of some kind. I do however have constant readers of my blog perceive me as the person with a toy dog.

Yes, maybe I feel to much for a consciousness struggling with itself trying to clear the water of the pond. I  can see a consciousness trying with all it's heart to clear up the pond water when all they are doing is adding to it's murkiness, this is obvious in the way some people are today expressing themselves in plain view. In all however, what the human collective consciousness chooses to do, it will do as this is it's path but we must be aware, there are other paths this human consciousness can still take, this is all I am portraying as always.