The Universe - An Abstract Expression

Written by Mathew Naismith

Before we get into this, it has been asked a number of times where I fit into the scheme of things, what human label do I fall under, my usual reply is that I am spiritually aware to some extent. It would seem I actually fall under the label mystic more than anything as I seem to fit this profile, I was also very heavily involved in mysticism in ancient Egypt in a past life, not long before hieroglyphs depicted light globes and helicopters on the walls of Hathor's temple.

Mysticism to me is like modern day science in that it's about becoming more aware, however, unlike modern day science, mysticism is void of any perceptions that are limiting, the following post is a prime example of this. I am also about the consciousness of mysticism, not the mechanics of mysticism, this basically means I avoid primarily using physical means to obtain an awareness. This is done for a very good reason, the five senses usually limits and hinders conscious awareness.

Now for the universe being but an abstract expression (representation). Firstly, what does this abstract universe represent?

Abstract Universe: This abstract universe represents a consciousness that everything else in existence has been created from, including other consciousness's. We often refer to this consciousness as the source of all creation or God for example, basically once again it's in reference to a consciousness that everything else has been created from, it's truly important to  comprehend this. To me, it's quite understandable why we relate this kind of consciousness to a God.

The abstract representation of this all creative consciousness, could be deemed as an illusion and often is by many, being that this all creative consciousness is real and where everything else has been abstractly copied from and only in part. To explain this better abstract art for instance is a reflection or an expression of parts of a something, this refers that the universe is but one of infinite expressions of this one consciousness.

Abstract art represents certain expressions while other expressions are ignored or not included within an expression (art). This exclusion of other parts changes the reflection of what is being expressed, you might even say this exclusion distorts what is real, however, as of consciousness, this distortion gives a different perspective to what is being expressed which produces a different perception that would otherwise be unknown.

What is real =  infinite + timelessness + reality

What is abstract = finite +time + illusion

Abstract expressions seems to distort reality, basically, giving a false representation of what is real, an illusion of what is real, however, in actually abstract expressions are not about giving a false representation of what is real, instead abstract expressions are about giving a different perspective of what is real while still representing, in part, what is real. What usually occurs is that a consciousness believes or wants to believe that this abstract universe is real in every sense, basically, we have fooled ourselves in believing in an abstract representation being a true representation of who we are as a whole. We have, within ourselves, created an illusion through our beliefs, basically, this abstract universe isn't giving us a false representation of this all creative consciousness, we are.

It's truly this simple, what is real is of the infinite, what isn't real is of the finite, all that time does is give this all creative consciousness a state of existence where the infinite consciousness can be expressed as a finite consciousness. Because the infinite is expressed in time, time can only express the infinite in parts, this automatically gives an abstract impression of the infinite. Time expresses certain expressions while other expressions are excluded, this is because time is of starting and ending points, within time, a consciousness is unable to express a starting and ending point at the same time, they need to be separated or expressed in parts giving a abstract appearance or perception.

It's good to be aware that this abstract universe and everything in it, is based on a real reflection distorted by time, this doesn't make everything in time an illusion unless a consciousness believes that this state is real. How many of us believe that obstruct art is a true depiction of that is real? Not many of us, there is however one thing to be aware of here, most often abstract art will portray a real expression that most people are unaware of or can perceive, could not the universe itself also be doing the same? In timelessness (infinite) we are one thing, in time (finite) we are something else however in stating this, it's wise to be aware that the universe is an abstract copied image of who we truly are as a whole.

Basically, we are talking about two sides of the coin here or yin and yang. the abstract (finite) being the other side of the coin compared to this all creative consciousness.

Yin = abstract + finite

Yang = reality/actual + infinite

Two Sides of the Coin: There are a number of similarities between the two sides of the coin to consider here, yin and yang, finite and infinite. On one hand we have the all creative consciousness that created everything, on the other hand we have consciousness's that emulate this creative consciousness by creating in it's own right, basically once again, creating but in an abstract way. We also have two sides of the coin, however, they are still of the same coin. We might also think one is real and the other isn't, what then depicts real when there is no unreal and visa-versa? Put in another way, what depicts yang without the yin?  

We might think we are thinking too much here, why can't one exist without the other being present?

To think this still takes a thought process to begin with. The point is, the infinite is of timelessness, this also means time has also always existed within this timeless state, in other words the other side of the coin, yin, has also always existed for there is no starting or ending point within timelessness (infinite consciousness). Yin and yang, finite and infinite, time and timelessness, two sides of the coin, have always existed, however, in an abstract universe/reality, one seems to exist without the other. It's like I said about abstract art, usually the emphasis is on certain expressions while ignoring other expressions, this often seems to give a distorted impression of what is real, in actuality what is occurring is that the abstract is an expression of the other side of the coin. Basically, abstract expressions represent an ignorance of one side of the coin to emphasise the other side of the coin more to become aware of the flaws or perfections of the coin as a whole, in other words consciousness as a whole.

Is it possible to experience both side of the coin, meaning, is it possible to be expressive of the finite and the infinite at the same time?

Absolutely, this however takes a consciousness to be aware of both sides of the coin without judging what is worthy and what isn't worthy, in other words a reflection and expression of pure balance.

Now to throw a spanner in the works, meaning, to desist in one conscious perception to become aware of another conscious perception. This all creative consciousness (God) is not just of the infinite, it's also of the finite (the abstract), as it's not just of timelessness, it's also of time, this is why I often call this all creative consciousness pure balance. We so often refer to this creative consciousness as being of one side of the coin and not the other, basically, of yin without the yang but consider this, this creative consciousness doesn't just represent one side of the coin because it is the coin itself. This however doesn't mean that infinite consciousness (God) isn't of infinite consciousness, often when a consciousness is becoming aware of the other side of the coin, it will see this other side of the coin as being some kind of God, this is inevitable. The reason for this is simple, when a consciousness becomes aware of an awareness beyond it's comprehension, it either ignores this awareness or depicts it as a higher consciousness than of itself.

The abstract universe has fragmented consciousness to depict certain expressions of itself while ignoring other expressions, however within this process, consciousness can become highly destructive mainly because it's unaware or deliberately stays ignorant to the other side of the coin thus giving such a consciousness an imbalance way of existing. We can indeed correct this, not just by becoming of one side of the coin, finite or infinite consciousness, but by becoming the coin itself, consciousness as a whole......      

Using Love in a Balanced Way

Written by Mathew Naismith

Consciousness is likened to a pool of water, one drop of rain causes a ripple that is soon enveloped within the stillness of the pond, however, numerous drops of rain cause the pond to become chaotic as each ripple, caused by the drops of rain, fight against each other. Because of such turbulence, the pond then becomes murky.

Try to imagine human consciousness as a pond of water, to much of a good thing can cause an imbalance within the pond turning it murky. At present, I perceive human consciousness as being murky and it's becoming murkier. The reason for this stems from an imbalance of too much rain or not enough rain. To much of one thing applied in an imbalanced way, will cause the water (human consciousness) to become murky through  chaotic interactions and counteractions, this is likened to rain drops fighting against each other.

Pond = human consciousness

Water = love and light

Balance = harmony

Imbalance = chaos

It is obvious that any kind of counteraction will cause the pond (human consciousness) to become murkier, it is therefore obvious that any love used in an imbalanced way, will cause the pond to become murkier instead of clearer.

As we become spiritually aware, we feel we naturally become more of love and light, we then naturally feel human consciousness (the pond) couldn't get enough love and light, especially in relation (retaliation) to a chaotic reality. Psychologically all we have done is humanly responded to a chaotic situation in retaliation, this is a natural human psychological response in situations like this. I know there are spiritually aware people who don't think psychology belongs in spirituality but it does, used in the correct way, it quietens the mind. In actuality, any spiritual practice that quietens the mind, is a form of  psychology.       

How is the pond (human consciousness) going to respond to too much water (love and light) at a given time, especially when the pond is not structured to take this amount of water in the first place? Human consciousness (the pond) is unable to sustain or comprehend this amount of water (love and light), too much of an imbalance will cause more chaos, not less. Too much chaos will also cause the pond to become structured in a different way, we might think this is what we want but what if the pond (human consciousness) just became another muddy back water due to it's restructuring!!

When leaders of the world today get up and clearly state they are going to kill as many women and children as possible (Palestinians), which is also being supported by western countries, is this a sign the pond is clearing. What about western leaders clearly stating they would kill Jesus if he lived today, these kind of thoughts and actions are no longer being stated behind closed doors. These actions are certainly not a sign that the water is even starting to become clear, in actuality, it's a sign human consciousness is becoming a muddy back water. The reason for this is clear to people like myself, too many ripples upon the pond is turning the water of the pond murky.

Now let's again perceive human consciousness being a pond, what would occur if the pond was drizzled upon instead of rained upon? The ripples caused by the drizzle causes far less chaos upon the pond of water than rain, within this, there is a balance between the pond of water and the drizzle, drizzle of cause being a lot more passive and thoughtful of the pond of water (human consciousness) than rain. This is the point, balance between the pond (humans consciousness) and the water (love and light) but this is clearly not occurring at present manly because we are still in a retaliative mode of thought and reasoning.

If we look at the pond (human consciousness), it is full of water (love and light), this is different to a pond full of mud (love and dark). It's very hard becoming aware in mud but a lot easier in a clear pond of water...Mathew G

We might think I should have stated hate and dark instead of love and dark, not at all, this is due to many people also passionately love to kill, love war and conflicts, love to hurt and cause pain with the same passion than any other kind of expression of love. We can deny this as much as we like but this denial won't help us make the pond water clear again, no kind of an unawareness or blatant ignorance will.  

I must be a horrid person stating all this and yes, I have been  judged by many as something unbecoming in some way, especially in relation or comparison to themselves.

A couple of days ago I saw a lass (female) that I know get into her car with her dog outside of my house, I immediately got my life size toy dog and went outside to wave my friend off using the paw of my toy dog to do so. I am a fifty two year old bloke with no  inhibitions, this is quite obvious to all my friends. The other day one of my wife's friends asked my wife if I was drunk because I was acting without inhibitions. When I lived in a small town, a lot of the town folk thought I was taking some kind of drug as I was mostly always cheerful and happy. This is who I am even though my writings may be misconstrued, sometimes deliberately, to portray me as some kind of monster or demeaning entity of some kind. I do however have constant readers of my blog perceive me as the person with a toy dog.

Yes, maybe I feel to much for a consciousness struggling with itself trying to clear the water of the pond. I  can see a consciousness trying with all it's heart to clear up the pond water when all they are doing is adding to it's murkiness, this is obvious in the way some people are today expressing themselves in plain view. In all however, what the human collective consciousness chooses to do, it will do as this is it's path but we must be aware, there are other paths this human consciousness can still take, this is all I am portraying as always.        

           

Are People Like Me Wrong or Wronged!!

Written by Mathew Naismith

First of all to all my readers of my blog, please do not defend my views and perceptions to my detractors, I think my posts speak for themselves and so do the adverse reactions I get from my detractors. I would not like to think that anyone is being abused or attacked in some way because of what I write, please don't put yourselves in harms way.     

Going by my detractors of course, I am plainly wrong and I do have a number of detractors that have indeed labelled me into a certain level, a level that is below my detractors of course. My writings have certainly upset a number of people, or more precisely, certain people who don't like what I write, have upset themselves.

It is widely said by my destructors, that I don't like my own perceptions and perspectives questioned, I also don't make the effort to understand other people's perceptions and perspectives. My blog is full of posts relating to lengthy discussions with people who don't like what I write, actually, the longest discussions I have are with people queering my writings. It is also obvious that I have a varied perceptions that seems to be unlimited, I suppose so it should be too.

Quite a number of people have become upset with me when in conversation with me and have consequently become my detractors, the reason for this isn't the reasons they give like, I don't like my perceptions and perspectives questioned, but something else.

- I quite often have a reasonable answer to support my perceptions, this doesn't go down well with anyone trying to prove me wrong in some way

- I am often clinical and often support my views with some kind of supporting evidence, this too doesn't go down well

- I usually don't stoop to name calling or attacking the other persons character like they do mine, this often infuriates people trying to prove me wrong

- Most often my perceptions question other people's ideologies that they are trying to sell to people in some way. If these people are trying to make money from there ideologies, it is obvious that this too will infuriate these people

- I have also, to a degree, stopped answering questions from people who are obvious within their bias, especially people with extreme biases, what is the point. I have had numerous discussions with people like this to no avail, these people usually end up being my detractor in the end, as if I need that!!

- I have also put into question the validity of love being primarily used to heal the world, this too infuriated some people. What would the devil won't you to do, hate or love more? Love, because love often creates huge amounts of pain as well. Love has a huge association to pain, how could love be yet another new be and end all when so much pain is also associated to love, love is too ambiguous to be the new be and end all, also, what reaction are we seeing from this love today in the world? It's not helping for a very good reason.

My wife is a trained natural therapist, her teacher told her never use the word love with her clients as the word love is too ambiguous and is often related to pain by many people. Yes, I'm often attacked for views like this, it is after all the age of false prophets/people!!  

My blog has also been tapered with on more than one occasion, obviously one of my detractors didn't like my posts being liked so much, vary few of the likes from Google appear on my posts these days. This doesn't worry me, all these people are doing is hurting themselves and showing who they really are.

This post came about because of two separate exchanges I had with two different people recently.

____________________________________

   

Reply

It's true that it's important to embrace attempts to understand other perspectives and perceptions... But an important reminder is that the same applies for you. If someone disagrees with your perception/perspective, can you try to comprehend from their point of view too?

My Reply

I often do myself and the proof is in the pudding, the proof being that it is obvious I perceive in a huge variant/spectrum, my numerous posts clearly show this. I can clearly understand that most people are unable, or more likely unwilling, to comprehend my various perceptions and perspectives, we do become too attached to our be and end all's. 

Do I like my perceptions questioned by bias perspectives/persons? No, what is the point when people who are obvious within their bias, questioning anything that doesn't fit within their be and end all? The world is full of these no points, I'm certainly not going to add to this. 

Do I understand this rigid stance? I think it's obvious I do but do these same people try to understand my flexible stance? It is obvious they don't but this too is understandable. 

My writings are certainly not for everyone, they are too variant and of the spectrum as opposed to levels, labels and scales. It is obvious I perceive more openly therefore different to most people.

Am I full of myself? No, this way of perceiving comes too naturally for me to be full of myself, it's a natural ability we all have but this natural ability is often stifled because of our fixations to various levels, labels and scales. 

In saying all this, is it wrong in being this attached to levels, labels and scales, in other words limited? No but their is another less destructive and limiting way to exist. 

Do you think I am dogmatic within my perceptions and perspectives Heather? Try me....

____________________________________

The following exchange is obviously from a different person altogether.

____________________________________

Reply

Mathew--you have such an enlightened and progressive outlook and viewpoint--it is refreshing to see this. I admire your insight and compassion

My Reply

Good to hear from you Terri as always. I put myself out there so that the people who want to listen, have something to listen to that they can relate to, I'm concerned......

Reply

yea--You are a prince Mathew--truly; very few people like you, esp men, in this day and age. I read all of your posts, so i can see what kind of trouble you are getting into

My Reply

This is exactly why people like myself love people like you and you talk about me being a prince!!

You are honest, faithful, true and beloved, I truly mean beloved by God, I know you won't take offence of myself using the word God.

If I didn't get a rebuff of some kind, I wouldn't be doing what I am supposed to, this is the way of the wind. Human consciousness is obviously lost/imbalanced, through this imbalance, people like you and I will often receive a rebuff, this to be expected in such an imbalanced consciousness, a consciousness that is furthermost from God's consciousness. The further away from God's consciousness we become, the more imbalanced we become and the more chaotic the reality becomes we exist in.

Terri, don't ever defend people like myself in such a reality, this is very important, people like me are expendable, people like you aren't for you are the core of true faith where's people like me are but a servant of that faith, this is true. 

I tell it how it truly is said, not the way people would like it to be said or even how I would like it to be said.....I didn't use proper English here for a very good reason.

Reply

You are not expendable at all Mathew--you are very important in establishing and maintaining that elusive Balance. It is thru hardship and overcoming obstacles that we grow--I know you know this, and I know you live by that principle. I am grateful to have you as a true friend and a loving spirit-guide who stays sane in an insane world.

My Reply

You too are a blessing Terri in an insane imbalanced world, much blessing to you and yours.

____________________________________

To my reader again, please do not put yourself in harms way in any sense, I certainly appreciate your support but please see it from my view, it's just not worth it......each to their own.   

Humbling Ourselves - The Soul Spectrum

Written by Mathew Naismith

If you are unable or unwilling to try to comprehend other perspectives and perceptions, this post is definitely not for you. Comprehending other perspectives and perceptions doesn't mean you replace one with the other or your own with someone else's, it just means acquiring the ability to understand other conscious entities perspectives and perceptions. Basically, becoming aware beyond the limitations of human perspectives and perceptions create.

Now I didn't label/head this post with, Humbling Ourselves - The Soul Spectrum, for no reason. Usually when referring to the soul, I would make reverence to the soul as a level. The soul level as opposed to human level, how else in a 3rd dimension can we make reverence without differentiating one state to another without making reference to a level?  I used spectrum because spectrum is not limited to a specific set of values but can vary infinitely within a continuum. It's important to remember this as spectrum is not limited to a specific set of values, however,  levels are often  in reference to specific set values, basically, levels are limiting, spectrums aren't.

I am quite aware that I am humbling myself in reverence to human consciousness in relation to the soul spectrum. By experiencing human consciousness, my soul is humbling itself.  Now we might think I am making reference to a level here, being that the human consciousness is obvious in it's lack of awareness for only in ignorance can a consciousness become destructive but I'm not. I don't have a destructive soul by nature but some souls are destructive by nature, this is not defining levels, it's actually defining a spectrum as each soul consciousness is as varied as each human consciousness. Human consciousness thinks in levels, our souls consciousness thinks in spectrums, however, if a soul is destructive by nature, the soul itself will also think in levels.

We might then think that some human consciousness's also think in spectrums, as some human consciousness's are not destructive by nature, this however isn't the case as we often forget we are firstly of the soul and secondly of human. Quite often the souls consciousness influences the human spectrum/consciousness, when this occurs, the human consciousness is then no longer primarily of human consciousness, it becomes the souls consciousness. It's difficult for a lot of us to perceive but the soul is not human or of human consciousness, so when we are influenced by the soul, we are no longer primarily of human consciousness even though we are still physically and mentally human.          

I should point out here that science has confirmed, in various ways, that we indeed have a soul or a consciousness that can exist apart from physicality.

This is great when an obvious constructive soul is influential upon human consciousness, however,  what occurs when an obvious destructive soul is influential upon the human consciousness? The world around us at present is a good example of what occurs when obvious destructive souls are more influential upon human consciousness. It's wise to be aware that souls, destructive or constructive by nature, are not of human consciousness, in actuality, it's these different souls spectrums that has formed/created human consciousness to what it is today.

So is there a human consciousness as such?

In reference to spectrums, no, in reference to levels, yes, remembering, levels make reference to limitations, spectrums however have no limitations as they are variable.

Human consciousness is created from non-human consciousness, the reason why human consciousness is what it is, has to do with the influence different souls spectrums have had upon it, in a sense, human consciousness is also variable within it's varied expressions even though human consciousness is predominantly influenced by levels, these levels of course limit human consciousness. Human consciousness is quite amazing actually within it's variations of influences that human consciousness is created from.

So are all souls humbling themselves to human consciousness?

When we consider that only in ignorance can a consciousness become destructive, it is obvious that not all souls are humbling themselves to human consciousness but is this truly the case. We might now presume that souls that are destructive by nature, are not humbling themselves for human consciousness as a whole isn't as destructive as some souls are, meaning, human consciousness is less destructive as some souls. We might then think because human consciousness is less destructive than some souls are, these souls that are destructive by nature, can't possibly be humbling themselves as human consciousness is less destructive compared to their own souls consciousness, this isn't actually the case however. Because some souls are destructive by nature, experiencing a less destructive consciousness is humbling themselves to human consciousness.

Ignorance is obvious within it's destructive tendencies and awareness is obvious within it's constructive tendencies. A soul that is destructive by nature, humbles itself to a consciousness that is less destructive while a soul that is constructive by nature, is also humbled by a more destructive consciousness. The human consciousness spectrum is variable therefore all less variable consciousness's will be humbled by human consciousness. If we measure human consciousness by levels, human consciousness is either horrid or beautiful, however, when we perceive human consciousness in spectrums, it's neither one or the other because human consciousness is too variable within it's influences brought about by variable souls that influence such a consciousness.

In all, every soul seems to be, to one extent or another, humbling itself to human consciousness. The reason for this lies in the spectrums of human consciousness, not the levels of human consciousness.

In a sense human consciousness is beautiful within it's variations, it's quite amazing actually but only because I perceive the spectrums of human consciousness, not measure human consciousness by levels. Levels define a limitation and judgment, spectrums define limitlessness and an unbiased observation.      

A Better Way of Living

Written by Mathew Naismith

- I was left with a fully dislocated elbow since I was six years old, I am now 51, whoops 52, years old and I don't take pain killers. I have also, through my life, taken on jobs that able people thought too hard to do.

- My mother recently passed away under dubious circumstances, this hit me quite hard, no one deserves to be abused in my mind, even the abusers. This didn't hit me as hard as it could have because I feel and know that my mother is living more of a life than ever.

The point is, because of my beliefs and faiths, life wasn't as hard as it could have been.

Think on this, if I labelled and measured every point and circumstance in my life, could I have accomplished the outlook I have today? Absolutely not as each label and measurement of our lives only creates and further adds to misery, in actuality, what misery. If I was to measure what level of misery I went through, would I still have the outlook I have today? The answer to this question is obvious.

In all, it's wise to desist in using labels, scales and levels as much as possible, in my mind anyway.        

End of post...

3rd Dimensional - Levels, Scales and Labels

Written by Mathew Naismith

We are supposed to be shifting into a new consciousness, this means we will shift from human consciousness to what is often called a higher consciousness, a consciousness with higher vibrations. This is interesting because only in a fear based consciousness will a consciousness measure itself and everything else according to levels, scales and labels. This is due to a consciousness not wanting to be of  a lower consciousness, they instead desire to be of a higher consciousness, a higher level of vibration, the strange thing is, no actual deemed higher consciousness desires to be of this higher consciousness, in actuality, such a consciousness will often express itself as a deemed lower consciousness. Basically, this kind of consciousness humbles itself but of course such a consciousness doesn't deem itself humbling itself either, this is a 3rd dimensional perception.

What is called a 3rd dimension is in actuality a reality based on fear, human history alone shows us this as does natural history as such. We might think, in deemed higher dimensions, that dimensions are also measured in this way but there not, only in a fear based reality, or a reality of some kind of fear, will measure existences like this.

I should point out, a higher vibration just means that a consciousness is more aware and wiser than consciousness's that aren't as aware and wise. This isn't a level, it's an observation and the reason for this is simple, there are no labelling from one to ten for example of awareness and wisdom. This kind of consciousness isn't based on fear of being of a lowly level of a kind, it's based on the obvious void of labelling.

However, it is quite understandable that within a 3rd dimension, a fear based reality, that consciousness's need levels, scales and labels to comprehend anything beyond a fear based reality. We have however made this into a problem for ourselves, we just can't stop measuring everything, in actuality, western spirituality is more about levels, scales and labels more than ever. Basically, we have become too fixated to this kind of consciousness to truly comprehend any other more aware and wiser consciousness, we have basically limited ourselves to a fear based consciousness.

I am now going to share a piece of a conversation I had with another person in relation to this topic.         

 __________________

      

Reply

I don't believe that any vibrations, or people for that matter are less worthy. I don't believe any are more worthy.

I lean towards ....what does there have to be a scale to begin with? If there is a scale, people will judge.

People have done enough damage with their constant judging.

My Reply

Yep, I'm hearing you. All this is of the 3rd dimension, but, again these dimensions are but scales and levels. Because the 3rd D is lesser value than the 4th D, we assume the 3rd D is lowlier than the 4th D, however, when you observe this, no dimension is assumed to be above the other in any way.

Is a reality based on fear of a lesser value than a reality based on love? Most people on here would say it is, this is obvious in the way this reality is downed so much. It's a reality based on fear and it's supposed to be based on fear, only the wise and aware souls will still express a true sense of unconditional love and understanding in such a reality.

Is now the wiser and aware of a higher level or more worthy than the less wise and aware? No, only in a reality based on fear will a consciousness judge in these terms. We are still judging in levels, scales and labels at the same time we have presumed we are not of this dimension but are unconditionally loving and of the light. Any consciousness that is downing this reality, isn't truly unconditionally loving as they obviously have conditions to their love.

Do I love this reality? Yes, for what it is, not for what it isn't, this is the difference. It would seem most western spiritually aware people have a disdain for this reality for what it isn't. It is what it is, once a consciousness realises this, a sense of harmony and stillness becomes one. Do I like what is occurring in this reality, especially at present? No, I'm not supposed to but other souls are supposed to. I am supposed to react but in accordance with a more balanced view and understanding. I don't always accomplish this myself as this too is supposed to be a part of my reaction. If I am a part and expressional of this fear based reality, how could I not love this reality as it's a part of me!!

I'm not trying to run away from anything, even though at times a feel like doing so, this is why I don't judge this reality too harshly for it is what it is, predominantly fear based as it's meant to be.

__________________

Observe the people who are attracted to what I write, these people are often not expressional of fear because they are not predominantly influenced by a reality of fear. Basically, these people have become unconditioned, to one degree or another, to a reality of fear. However, observe the people who don't like what I write, the reactions are quite different because they are still conditioned in accordance to a reality of fear. I'm often measured (judged) and then slammed or ostracised, this once again occurred just recently, this reaction however is understandable. How would anyone conditioned to a fear based reality comprehend what I write, at times I don't, most likely because I am also predominantly influenced by this fear based reality at times myself.

This fear based reality is supposed to be limiting, this is until a consciousness learns enough from these kinds of reality to overcome the influence and the conditioning of these kinds of realities. The question is now, if we cut out the limiting influences of consciousness as a whole, is such a  consciousness still whole? This would be like cutting out the yin within ourselves and still calling ourselves whole, limiting realties are a part of the whole as limitless realities are.

It was said to me that labelling yourself as a higher vibration is not based on fear, then why label yourself in the first place as being of a higher vibration if you don't fear being of  lowly vibration? Also, levels, scales and labels are all based on a fear based reality, they were created from a fear base perspective, this is obvious, one has to be higher or lower than another. A lot of us are unable to perceive void of these levels, scales and labels, this is because we have all been conditioned, to one degree or another, to perceive in this limited way and it is limiting. Imagine a reality void of labels, now imagine how you would perceive without these labels to perceive by. The more you imagine this, the more of a reality it becomes, this is due to the more you comprehend and existence void of labels, the more you comprehend the perceptions that come from fearless realities.

Human consciousness is obvious within it's conditioning, it's primarily built upon fear so any perception that is predominately of this fear, will be based on fear. Levels, scales and labels are a creation of this fear, it's wise to be aware of this if we want to evolve from limiting human conscious perceptions and perspectives.

Note: I do apologise for lacking penmanship, an ability to write more subtly, my writings style is more clinical and isn't for everyone.           

Balance and Creators of Balance

Written by Mathew Naismith

OK people, please don't take my writings as being gospel or of utter truth, it's plainly not, how could it be when consciousness itself is infinite and varied to the degree it is? Too many people have taken my writing way too seriously, as I have always stipulated, it's only my perception of things, OK , it comes through me a lot of times but it's still comes down to my perception of what is coming through me!!

You must ask of yourselves why of what I write is upsetting you in anyway, is it your fixations to your own ideologies and perceptions that is causing this? All I am stating is sit back and observe yourselves and express a little more balance if you really want to make a difference. Whatever the human collective consciousness desires to do is fine with people like myself, it's just if you really want to make a difference, desist in being so extreme and fixated to your own ideologies and perceptions. Try understanding other perceptions and see where these perspectives are coming from, you will be surprised in what comes out of this. Try dropping some of the self-labels as well!! 

The following post, I think, is an extension of my already extended perceptions and perspectives. If you took offence to my previous writings, you will certainly take offence to the following.      

____________________________

My topics at the moment seem to be based on balance, only because for change to occur, it is wise that any change made is enacted in a balance way. Of course the reason for this is obvious, any kind of implemented imbalance will only cause destruction and further chaos. We might think a predominant positive approach is the way to go but where is the balance when the positive is predominant? A true positive approach isn't destructive in any sense, this also means it's not destructive towards the negative either. A true positive isn't destructive towards the negatives as  it will see the benefits within the negatives, meaning, it will see the positives within the negatives.

Aware Consciousness: This is the same with consciousness's of light, a consciousness that is observed as being aware. A true consciousness of light is unable to destroy the dark in any sense, any truly aware consciousness is unable to be destructive. What this kind of consciousness will do is balance out the negative with positives while knowing that negatives are as worthy as positives. This however is different with the negatives, the consciousness's that are observed as being unaware will be destructive for only in ignorance can a consciousness destroy. It's important here to realise that only in ignorance can we destroy, or, only in darkness, which denotes an unawareness, can we destroy, now how many positives are trying to destroy the negatives in the world? There is a very good reason for This approach from aware people, people of the light so to speak.

Let's first look at the amount of labels I've used already, we must be aware that the more labels we use, the harder life will be to balance, however, how is an unaware consciousness able to become aware without labels while existing in an unaware conscious state? How is an aware consciousness to know it's aware without the a comparison like an unaware, dark or negative. Consciousness can only become conscious of it's awareness if there is a comparison. You see the negative aren't really as dark as we presume. We label dark as negative, light as positive but that is not entirely correct, the yin needs the yang to exist, It's of course a lot less destructive if the yin and yang coexist in balance, of course any coexistence takes a balanced approach, not an imbalanced approach!!

Human consciousness is primarily naturally destructive, for human consciousness to become more constructive, it needs to be nurtured and reconditioned to exist in a more constructive way, this won't occur if we go out to destroy all judged or observed labelled negatives or dark consciousness's. Once again, a true aware consciousness is unable to destroy anything, including the labelled negatives and this is the point. A truly aware consciousness is also unable to label one one thing and another something else, meaning, just because the yin is judged as being yin, doesn't mean it's not also of yang. Also, what is positive to one person doesn't mean it's positive to another person and visa-versa.

Balance or Balancer!!: It's obvious that a more balanced approach is wiser but are we the balance itself or the creators of this balance?

Now you might notice in the figure above that the word balance is on the shaft and the cross member, this is to depict that we are of the balance itself and the creators of balance, basically, the balancer of yin and yang's labels. Let's now look at this in a different way. 

You will notice I have replaced balance with God's consciousness or creative consciousness. Please do not presume I am talking about a biblical representation of God here, basically, this kind of consciousness is void of labels and is of pure wisdom, awareness and balance. You could say labels un-purify's   consciousness, in other words a controlling ego influences a consciousness to be of what it's not. This pure untainted consciousness is what we often deem a God.     

Looking at the scales above, we have what is called God's consciousness and then we have the soul. We then have the scales themselves which hold the many labels we use and under these labels we have yin and yang. Yin and yang represent the human self, in actuality, yin and yang represent everything that has been created, this means everything that has been created, is influenced by yin and yang.

Now if we were to take away what supports these scales, is the scales any longer scales? No, now take away the scales, the labels and yin and yang, is God's consciousness still God's consciousness? Yes, now take away the soul, is God's consciousness still God's consciousness? I myself find this perception quite interesting, we are the balance but in creation we also become the balancer, the creations being the soul and all the labels we ourselves create.

Counter-reaction: Chaotic existences can only be created by some kind of an imbalance, it's obvious we exist in a chaotic destructive existence. How would a consciousness, that isn't pleased with this kind of existence, going to react? It's going to react with the opposite, an opposing opposite, basically, to an extreme to block out or destroy the perceived darkness of such a reality. Even blocking out this perceived darkness (negative), we are purposely destroying this darkness, and  in actuality, we are still enacting out the darkness because we are still destructive. Any true sense of love and light lives within the dark without destroying it, it will instead find the positives (light) within the dark without becoming the dark itself. This is what a true sense of unconditional love is about, it's not about unconditionally loving what we desire to love but loving everything void of any conditions what so ever.

Because this reality is as chaotic as it is, any love and light void of a true sense of unconditional love existing in this reality, has conditions. This is brought about by existing in such a reality. Only in ignorance can a consciousness destroy, what are so many people of love and light tying to do to an extreme? Basically, they are still enacting out the attributes of darkness, the very thing they are trying to destroy. This reaction however is normal for a still unaware consciousness to do, no truly aware conscious will react in counteraction to any situation, it will instead try to find balance within such a situation/reality without becoming destructive within itself in anyway.

The dark is not just of dark either as the light is just not of light, if everything was of light, the existence of dark would still exist within the darker shades of light. This is because conscious itself is not limited to certain boundaries, only our own consciousness has these boundaries and is limited by these boundaries. We label something dark therefore negative and bad and something else positive therefore positive and good. The reaction between these perceptions/boundaries is going to be opposing until they find common ground, the yin within the yang as in the yang within the yin, in other words balance.......

We are the balance, a conscious void of labels but we are also the balancer, the creator of balance within any reality of labels, the light and dark of life. A truly harmonious existence can only be obtained through balance, not the destruction of the other, it's this simple. Also, a balance between a consciousness void of labels and a consciousness of labels will also help bring harmony into a consciousness, basically, a balance between the spiritual and the physical, not one or the other.