Written by Mathew Naismith
It would seem I've always perceived life,
finite existence, likened to a panoramic view with no separation, meaning that
there are no segments or separate lives lived, it's one life. As I have written
in posts a few years ago now, I don't perceive, for example, reincarnation as depicting
separate lives lived, it's more likened to one life lived separated by
intermissions or separate scenes like in a lengthy motion picture. I look at
all my finite existence as a motion picture, each frame and scene make up this
motion picture we call life, we can either perceive this motion picture as a
picture in motion separated by scenes, or, observe this motion picture as a
motionless panoramic photo/picture.
Finite = motion picture + separatism +
motion + participator + time
Infinite = panoramic photo + collective +
motionless + observer + timelessness
Finite existence can give the view or
perception of separate lives, you could say this is an illusion as finite existence
can delude us to perceive in a separatist way. The question is, is finite existence
truly and really about separatism? It's a paradox because the answer is yes and
no. Yes, when we perceive through infinite perceptions and no, not when we are
perceiving through a finite perception.
Finite
existence; refers to an existence of a participator
rather than an observer, of course to participate, we need motion or a means to
create motion, this is of course is where time comes into it as time is all
about motion. To create motion however, you need to first separate this picture
into segments or frames, like a movie motion picture, to give it motion, time
does this very well.
Infinite
existence; refers to an existence of an observer,
the observer observing the whole of life as one frame or as a motionless panoramic
photo. It's quite understandable why the observer is more aware and wiser than
a participator.
However, as many people like me have done,
you can exist by a finite and infinite existence, this allows one to experience
finite existence while at times observing these experiences. What I don't do is
separate finite existence from infinite existence, any kind of separation
denotes predominant finite perceptions within the act of separating one from
the other. This means no matter how traumatising an experience is within finite
existences, it's just as accepted, and most importantly, appreciated as an infinite
existence experience. You of course can only be appreciative of life traumas
when being the observer through an infinite existence, perceiving predominately
through finite perceptions will only enhance traumas.
How
does one appreciate traumatising times in one's life?
You don't at the time of the trauma, this
act in being unappreciative is also appreciated but only when you observe the
whole life, not one segment of frame of life and this is the point. The more we
separate life into individual segments, the more dramatic our lives become, how
dramatic is a movie motion picture compared to a panoramic photo? Even if the
panoramic photo was of a traumatising time, once you put this still picture
into motion, it makes the scene a lot more dramatic, our lives in a finite
reality are very much like this.
Take a look at the difference between the
perceptions of ISIS and consumerist materialism or one religion to another for
example, each difference within these group of people denote a different frame
or scene within a motion picture. Now observe these differences as one whole
picture as if you are watching all of a motion picture all at once as one
motionless picture, what you are observing becomes automatically less dramatic.
Do
people like myself allow drama and trauma to be a part of their lives?
Absolutely, for to do otherwise would to be
predominantly of finite existence through the simple expression of separating
one from the other.
Does
this mean we should just accept the dramas and traumas in our lives?
It's really up to the individual, however,
if you no longer want to be a participator within a finite reality, become the
observer by not separating life, as a whole, into different segments. This
means stop separating one part of life, no matter how traumatising it is, from
other parts of your life, observe your whole existence as one life lived.
As of always, balance is the key, don't try
to push something away by pulling something in and expect a more balanced
peaceful existence, this just isn't going to occur as human history quite
plainly shows us. Any retaliation will create an opposing retaliation, pulling
something in to push something out denotes a participator, instead, also become
an observer which depicts an infinite existence that will balance out the
finite existence. Yes. at times it's a fine balance, at times balancing one
extreme with another but note, every extreme will create more drama. Balancing
out life with one extreme with another extreme denotes a predominant finite
existence. The less of the extreme we express, the more of the infinite we
become.
Finite or infinite existence on it's own
isn't balance, finite existence is all about drama and trauma where's infinite
existence is all about a passive existence, one being seemingly separate to the
other. I do find it strange that people who are trying to be of infinite
existence, will at times totally separate themselves from finite existence,
this action is of course primarily of finite existence, any separation denotes
a finite existence.
A true infinite existence takes one to
balance out finite and infinite existences, it's not about separating one from
the other. We are so used to perceiving in a motion picture way, we can only
perceive by separating one from the other. Each scene is separate to us in
finite existences where in infinite existences they are one of the same with no
separation from fame to frame, scene to scene as in a motion picture. A true
infinite existence is liked to a motionless panoramic picture showing all of
what is in one go, this might sound daunting but it's quite the opposite, it's
very reassuring and comforting. In effect, finite existence is only this
motionless panoramic picture of the infinite put into motion like a motion
picture.....
No comments:
Post a Comment