Written by Mathew Naismith
Buddhism relates all suffering to the ego
as all suffering can only be created through the ego mind. Looking around our
present environment today, it's difficult to refute this claim, however, this
doesn't make the ego bad or negative, just simply unaware especially in regards
to a controlling ego. As soon as we see the ego as being bad or negative in
some way, this is a good indication of the ego mind in control. Simply look at
the ego as an unaware state, state that is unaware of what it is apart of as a
whole.
Indeed, ego simply means a state of
existence experienced that is unaware of it's own connection to all else, and
the more controlling the ego mind is, the less aware a state of consciousness
naturally becomes. I say natural because it's quite natural for an ego in
control to be unaware, this is it's natural state, the trick is, the ego mind
controlled by the ego, not just of the ego mind, won't want to see this state
as being natural. What controlling ego desires to be of a natural state of
unawareness? An ego in control will often deceive itself; this is why this
state is naturally in a state of unawareness.
Yin and yang are good representations of
the ego mind or ego self. In balance with each other, they are only of the ego,
in imbalance, they are of the a controlling ego, One always trying to control
the other while refuting that is it apart of the other or connected to the
other in some way. For example, how often do the rich disconnect themselves
from the poor? The controlling ego mind always tries to disconnect itself from
the other; of course this disconnection naturally makes this kind of conscious
state unaware for obvious reasons.
Yin and yang working in perfect balance
naturally creates awareness, this is because this balance creates a union of
one working as one. Within this union, there is no yang or yin trying to
control the other, in turn naturally creating a state of awareness.
How often do we try to separate ourselves
from duality and only see our truer being as a non-dual state of existence or
being? Even though a non-dual state and a dual state of existence represents
yin and yang, our controlling ego mind still only sees our truer being as being
non-dualistic thus separation from the other has occurred. How aware is a
non-dualistic state of a dualistic state? It's simply not, as soon as a
non-dualistic state becomes aware of a dualistic state, it's become dualistic
in nature.
Simply, the ego in control deceives us to
think we are non-dualistic when all the time we are dualistic in nature. In
saying this, I do think we can enter into non-dualistic states which often give
us the perception that we are of this non-dualistic state and not truly also of
a dualistic state. As of yin and yang, one is of the other; all that the
perception of separation creates is an unawareness that naturally creates
suffering and destructiveness.
I had an interesting conversation with a
lass from Great Britain
recently, I will finish off this post with this conversation.
My
Reply
Fear should always be faced face on to
see it for what it truly is, a hollow apparition/phantom. Fear to me is simply
a consciousness's unawareness of what truly is. Only an unaware consciousness
can be and create a reality of fear based perceptions. Sounds awfully familiar
sadly enough, we simply don't have to be this way, we certainly have a choice
in my mind.
As like not perceiving/judging everything negative that is not of our own beliefs and perceptions, we should also try to see fear in a neutral light as our perceptions of fear being negative gives it it's control over us. This is why some people of love and light have gone way too far with love and light; everything else not of love and light is a negative. A true sense of love and light is to perceive everything as love and light, this simply isn't the case for most people it would seem.
People like me are more for the middle ground with no extremes, a totally neutral reality where all things are truly created and treated as equals, a true sense of balance. No extremes of light and dark, love and hate, will bring balance, there is simply no equilibrium with to and fro actions and counteractions between love and light, hate and dark.
Can love and light create a reality of love and light? For the individual or (a) collective consciousness, yes, most definitely, but it's still not a reality of a true sense of balance as each extreme reality creates it's opposite somewhere in the (whole) collective consciousness.
To a lot of people of love and light, love has no opposite, even when the opposite of hate is love. It's like extracting the yang from the yin and still calling it balance between yin and yang while extracting the yang from the yin altogether, a lot of people are simply fooling themselves here.
The reason for this, to me, is that these people have only gone part way in the awareness process, this one part of the awareness process feels good so this must be the be and end all. When you sit back from everything and observe it without bias, everything is neutral; this is until a consciousness perceives it otherwise, usually in retaliation to something the controlling ego doesn't desire like our present situation in the world for example.
Sorry, you started me off again; some people just have a knack of getting it to flow with me. When I converse with someone else who is also neutral in one sense or another, this brings forth the neutrality within me. Just imagine if everyone was neutral, we just simply wouldn't have a problem in the world, we would reflect off each other beautifully in relative perfect balance.
As like not perceiving/judging everything negative that is not of our own beliefs and perceptions, we should also try to see fear in a neutral light as our perceptions of fear being negative gives it it's control over us. This is why some people of love and light have gone way too far with love and light; everything else not of love and light is a negative. A true sense of love and light is to perceive everything as love and light, this simply isn't the case for most people it would seem.
People like me are more for the middle ground with no extremes, a totally neutral reality where all things are truly created and treated as equals, a true sense of balance. No extremes of light and dark, love and hate, will bring balance, there is simply no equilibrium with to and fro actions and counteractions between love and light, hate and dark.
Can love and light create a reality of love and light? For the individual or (a) collective consciousness, yes, most definitely, but it's still not a reality of a true sense of balance as each extreme reality creates it's opposite somewhere in the (whole) collective consciousness.
To a lot of people of love and light, love has no opposite, even when the opposite of hate is love. It's like extracting the yang from the yin and still calling it balance between yin and yang while extracting the yang from the yin altogether, a lot of people are simply fooling themselves here.
The reason for this, to me, is that these people have only gone part way in the awareness process, this one part of the awareness process feels good so this must be the be and end all. When you sit back from everything and observe it without bias, everything is neutral; this is until a consciousness perceives it otherwise, usually in retaliation to something the controlling ego doesn't desire like our present situation in the world for example.
Sorry, you started me off again; some people just have a knack of getting it to flow with me. When I converse with someone else who is also neutral in one sense or another, this brings forth the neutrality within me. Just imagine if everyone was neutral, we just simply wouldn't have a problem in the world, we would reflect off each other beautifully in relative perfect balance.
Reply
Everything just is. Duality is in fact
the whole.
Recently I have observed others talking about separation and encouraging others not to be divisive, which is a fundamental part of increasing consciousness.
Recently I have observed others talking about separation and encouraging others not to be divisive, which is a fundamental part of increasing consciousness.
However, as you have so eloquently
articulated, the end point is Love and Light for them. What they don't realise
is that by not embracing the whole, the light, the dark, the shadow, the love -
as One , then they are living a life of separation on another level.
It is easy to write these words but a whole different matter living by these terms.
It is easy to write these words but a whole different matter living by these terms.
My
Reply
Indeed, duality actually represents
the whole. Imagine being of non-duality, an unawareness of the duality within
the whole, how aware and whole are we then? In-effect, a non-dual state is all
about separation and unawareness, separating itself from duality, the yang if
you like. It's like being just of this light and love, how aware (enlightened)
are you truly? You're simply not. It's good to see someone else who tries not
to allow the controlling ego to control them; the ego desires one or the other
as always.
No comments:
Post a Comment