Written
by Mathew Naismith
For
anyone translating this post, the following quote is as above.
If everyone was
of wisdom,
there would no
conflict for
only can conflict
exist in a
consciousness
void of wisdom.
Wisdom
is seemingly likened to energy except like energy, wisdom can't even be
transformed. All energy can be transformed, however, no energy can be
destroyed, it's then funny to think wisdom can't even be transformed, is wisdom
as I have always said it be to, of the infinite? Yes, you can misinterpret
wisdom but you can't transform wisdom, for once wisdom is expressed like
energy, it is unable to be transformed for wisdom is of all ages.
It
would seem that wisdom doesn't have the same characteristics to energy, wisdom
doesn't even seem to be under the same laws and principles of energy. Being
that energy is of all expressions (motion), it's strange to think that wisdom,
when expressed, doesn't follow the same principles as energy.
When
you think on this, is energy that creates certain forms of all ages? No, for an
example, did vehicles or horseless motorised carriages exist a thousand years
ago? Did the entire universe exist before the big bang? Now consider this, did
wisdom?
Even
though human consciousness has tried to destroy wisdom, wisdom always prevails.
The resurgence of the teachings of Confucius in China , is a good example of this.
The same exact form of energy Confucius expressed, still exists as it did in
Confucius's time even after it's presumed destruction. The teachings of
Confucius weren't even transformed.
Let's
also take a look at Buddha and Socrates, these people, as well as Confucius,
weren't just expressing philosophy, they were also expressing wisdom. It's
important here not to get confused with thinking all philosophy is of wisdom,
philosophy can also be based on knowledge/intelligence void of wisdom. The
reason why people like these were noticeable compared to numerous other
philosophers and mystics, is that their philosophy became primarily based on wisdom.
Jesus is another prime example of this and so was Rumi.
It is
quite obvious that wisdom itself can't be transformed or destroyed , the
philosophy of wisdom is ageless, but what about wisdom existing before the
creation of the universe itself.
The following
links indicate wisdom existences before the creation of the universe,
basically, before consciousness was even expressed.
Consider
this, philosophy is of time, it's of the finite, why does wisdom when expressed
in conjunction with wisdom, become indestructible or even transformable? Why
also is one philosophy more compelling and memorable than to other forms of
philosophy? It seems that one form of philosophy is based on the finite, while
other forms are based on the infinite, infinite being of timelessness, a
consciousness not of time.
Am I
making reference that a philosophy based on wisdom, is beyond a consciousness
based on time? Absolutely.....
Take a
close look at all these great philosophers, now look at the time they spent in
silence. Don't get me wrong here, not everyone who spends time in silence
becomes instantly of this infinite wisdom, in actually, people can spend a life
time in silence and still not be able to connect with this infinite wisdom. The
difference is, once these people dropped pre-perceptions, meaning, detaching
themselves from human fixated attachments, they were then able to connect to
this infinite wisdom.
No one
who is fixated to any kind of ideology
or ism, is truly able to connect to this infinite wisdom, a wisdom that was
around before the creation of the universe. Yes, anyone who is knowledgeable is
able to recite an already expressed philosophy, but are able to connect to this
kind of wisdom. Of course anyone who is fixated to an ideology or ism, will
disagree with this as always. The controlling ego just doesn't want to let go
of a fixation.
In
saying all this, it's wiser to follow an already expressed wisdom than to not
express any kind of wisdom at all......Mathew G
Not
everyone will be able to connect to this infinite wisdom, motion takes too much
of our time to be able to make this kind of connection. Our best bet is to
follow an already impressed, established wisdom, in saying this, it's even
better when we make our own connection but again, motion often takes up too much
of our time to make this connection. In all, we must be appreciative and
accepting of the wisdom that has already been expressed as a motion.
It's
funny to think that no truly dogmatic forceful ideology or ism likes the
presence of a true expression of wisdom, as our past philosophers and mystics
have discovered in their own lives. Such an energy force will always try to
destroy this kind of wisdom if we don't protect it from such atrocity and
lunacy. As I have said for some time now, only in ignorance can a consciousness
destroy/destroy itself.
Please
once again, do not take anything that I have stated here as gospel or of utter
truth.
No comments:
Post a Comment