Written by Mathew Naismith
When you divide anything, it becomes
separate to the whole, a pie is a good example of this, now perceive the
collective whole consciousness as a pie, the more it's separated, the more pieces
we have. Every time we divide this pie, the smaller the pieces become,
consciousness is the same. Now consider the content of each piece as we divide
it, it too becomes smaller, now liken this content of the piece of pie to the
amount of consciousness awareness. If we keep dividing consciousness itself up,
this consciousness awareness becomes less and less due to the less content
within each piece of consciousness. Human consciousness and it's perceptions is
but one tiny piece of the pie.
Now how divided is this human consciousness?
How many different ideologies, concepts, countries and classes of people do we
have to name a few? Now how perceptive are these consciousnesses going to be on
their own when they are divided from the whole human collective consciousness?
Now consider how divided these divided human consciousnesses are compared to
the whole collective consciousness? We couldn't be more divided and the more we
label, the more divided we become from the collective consciousness, the whole
pie. In actuality, in a whole collective consciousness point of view, labels
don't exist, they can't for the main reason, their is no pieces of the pie to
label, only one whole pie..... You can't even label this whole pie as a
collective consciousness within a whole consciousness, we can only label this
whole consciousness within a divided consciousness.
Appreciations
of Labels: While I was talking to my wife about
this topic this morning, I noticed a women's photo in the paper, I was
instantly attracted, "what a dish". I then instantly realised how I
was attracted to a labelled opposite to myself, I however didn't label my
reaction to being one thing or another, it wasn't a negative or a positive
reaction, it was just a reaction to a labelled opposite to myself. I then
appreciated the appreciation my
labelling gave me, I actually appreciated being able to express more of
consciousness even when it's divided, however, by further labelling our own
labelling as being negative or positive in any sense, divides this pie up even
more to the extent of becoming opposing opposites instead of just labelled opposites.
Opposites do not instantly mean opposing,
it means we have a chance to express consciousness in every sense, of course
labelling by opposing opposites also allow us to further more express,
therefore experience, consciousness even more, this is when these divisions
become noticeably destructive however.
I appreciate my labelling but at the same
time
try to avoid labels that are opposing.....
Opposing
Divisions: Recently, I had lunch with some old work
colleagues, one of my past work colleagues asked me if I was going to catch up
with them next week, I said, "I will try", they then stated that try
is a negative. The point is, is not stating or labelling a negative a negative
to begin with? Within an undivided consciousness, there are no actual negatives
as the perception of negatives denote an opposing division, there are no
divisions within an undivided consciousness so negatives just don't exist
within an undivided consciousness but they do within a divided consciousness.
Once we label (judge) what is negative, we
do this through opposing divisions as opposed to a positive, meaning, once we
label, we divide negative and positive as opposing, this is different to
labelling a noticeable division between two opposites where there is no judged
negative or positive. Opposing divisions will always give us negatives and
positives, negatives and positives just don't exist within an undivided
consciousness due to the fact that there is no conscious opposition to itself.
When positives or negatives have no opposing opposites, what then makes a
positive and a negative? However, opposites, without being opposing, exist
within an undivided consciousness as there are no labels, it's these labels
that give us opposing perceptions and perspectives, divisions.
Undivided
Opposites: Now we might think an undivided
consciousness doesn't have opposites within itself as it's undivided. Let's
look at a pie here, is there not an outer and inner layer of the pie while the
pie is still whole? Is there not an outer and inner layer of all consciousness?
There are always opposites in everything without being opposing, opposing is
only relevant and existing within a divided consciousness. Opposites do not
automatically mean a division, yes, within a consciousness that divides there
is but not in an undivided consciousness.
We have indeed created these divisions that
have created a reality divided upon itself. The pie is perceived to be no
longer whole, in actuality, the pie just doesn't exist for us any more even
when all the content of the pie is still being experienced and expressed by us.
It's strange experiencing a consciousness that no longer sees itself as part of
the pie, consciousness itself as a whole. Human consciousness has divided
itself so much that it can no longer see it's still the pie, consciousness as a
whole. We don't have to stop in labelling opposites to realise we are the pie,
just stop labelling opposing opposites, within this, labels will no longer play
a major part in our existence as they do at present.
We too often think opposites has to be in
opposition when the truth is very different, but only in an undivided
consciousness is this different. The truth can only be found when consciousness
is no longer perceived as being divided, the pie is whole no matter how divided
it seems, there are no true opposing opposites, only opposites, the outer and
inner layer of the pie but as a whole with no divisions!!
No comments:
Post a Comment