Written by Mathew Naismith
This is an awkward post to write, actually, I wasn't going
to write it, it's going to be too ambiguous for a number of people, meaning,
for anyone religiously following a certain ideology, my explanations are going
to seem like a joke to them. This is all to do with explaining the different
aspects of things like God, ego, soul, for example. In most ideologies, these
things only have one meaning, one explanation, all other explanations are
irrelevant and wrong, I will however hopefully show this isn't correct, all
ideologies have their own truths which in turn creates a certain reality.
Which ideology speaks
the utter truth: over and above all other realities, is Buddhism correct
over and above Christianity or visa-versa? Is Islam correct over and above
Buddhism or visa-versa? Who actually defines what ideology is more correct over
and above all other ideologies? This is an important question to answer because
the answer to this question isn't ambiguous at all, actually, the answer is
quite unambiguous, meaning, the answer to this question is quite obvious.
At present we have religious extremists expressing
themselves in a very extreme way, this is wholly do to these people believing
their ideologies are the be and end all above all other ideologies.
What is the driving force behind these extreme reactions, what makes them extreme within their ideology?
Most people will just look at the ideology itself, in this case, this makes all the people who follow such ideologies, that can be expressed in an extreme way, extremists in some way. This analogy would also make all Christians extremist as well, especially when considering the religious Dark Ages. Does the actions of Christian extremists in the Dark Ages infer that all Christians today are extremists? Of course not. Extremism hasn't anything to do with the ideology itself, its to do with the implementation of such ideologies by certain people religiously following an ideology.
What is the driving force behind these extreme reactions, what makes them extreme within their ideology?
Most people will just look at the ideology itself, in this case, this makes all the people who follow such ideologies, that can be expressed in an extreme way, extremists in some way. This analogy would also make all Christians extremist as well, especially when considering the religious Dark Ages. Does the actions of Christian extremists in the Dark Ages infer that all Christians today are extremists? Of course not. Extremism hasn't anything to do with the ideology itself, its to do with the implementation of such ideologies by certain people religiously following an ideology.
If we are religiously following an ideology of one kind,
what human trait are we actually expressing to an extreme? Following any
ideology religiously is defined as an extreme reaction going by dictionary
definitions. The only human trait that can create extremism in any way is
egotism as opposed to ego.
So the answer to the question, who actually defines what
ideology is more correct is egotism, not the ideology itself. Yes, an ideology
can be written in an egotistical way but it's the way a person reacts to this
ideology that can cause it to become extreme. I don't know of too many
ideologies that aren't written in an egotistical way, God definitely exists,
God defiantly doesn't exist. You even have ideologies that state that all other
ideologies that have a believe in God and/or soul, are beliefs brought about by
delusions, in other words these ideologies are delusional, this is a quite a
broad statement to make. This kind of statement says to me that such statement
like this are highly influenced by egotism themselves. What other human trait, other
than egotism, would state such a statement?
I've seen people fixated to a certain ideology use science
to explain why God and souls don't exist, however, I've also seen people
following a different ideology use relevant science that explains that God and
the soul do exist, which one again is more correct over another? Egotism will
always state my ideology is more correct no matter what.
The point is, no ideology is perfectly correct, however, no
ideology is incorrect either, the truth is defined in what reality we presently
reside in. Does God defiantly exist? Most definitely but only in certain
realities.
The Infinite
Consciousness: There is supposed to be over 8 million realities within this
one physical reality, only egotism can state, categorically, which one is more
correct over and above all other ideologies. I do find it quite amusing that
some ideologies state that all ego expressions are an illusion, but in stating
so, have themselves not expressed a form of egotism!!
Consciousness itself is extremely diverse and infinite
within it's expression, it ever changing as human history quite plainly shows,
which ideology is always correct above all other ideologies? Once again egotism will say my ideology is
always correct but what does a consciousness, not influenced by egotism,
actually say?
All ideologies have merit within their own realities, if you
want to create a certain reality for yourself,
follow a certain ideology as it's these ideologies that create a
particular reality, in other words each ideology creates it's own reality. For
example, Buddhism creates a certain reality as does Christianity, Islam and
even materialism, is one reality more correct over and above another reality?
Egotism once again will say it is within it's own ideology, it's own reality.
Consciousness itself isn't defined by egotism nor ego, it
has not fixed to defined boundaries,
it's infinite within all it's expressions either it be of egotism, ego or a
state of being egoless.
Materialism; expresses a state of egotism and creates
relative realities according to the ideology being expressed.
Religions like Christianity; mostly expresses ego and creates relative realities according to the ideology being expressed.
Religions like Buddhism; creates a state mostly void
of the ego and creates relative realities according to the ideology being
expressed. One might judge, "To express materialism is less worthy than to
express Buddhism for example, one is more of a delusion than another". The only
part of the humans self that will make this statement is egotism.
Consciousness is that vast and infinite within it's
expressions and non-expressions, there are no true delusion, the only delusion
there is, is only knowing that we are only of one of these realities. We are
not just egotism or ego nor egoless, we are all of what is.
In all, is it wrong to just choose one reality to exist by?
I will answer this with another question, is it wrong in being physically
human? Experiencing being human is experiencing one reality, this isn't wrong
no matter what way we express ourselves, we can however express ourselves to the
point of being highly destructive though, even this isn't wrong. When we look
at our destructiveness only through this reality, destruction is wrong,
however, this view changes when we realise we are all of what is, there is no
right or wrong, just different expressions of consciousness that a wise
collective consciousness would change to something more constructive I feel.
It matters not what reality you choose to experience, what
does matter is how destructive our fixation to a reality can become when
expressed to an extreme.
No comments:
Post a Comment