Written by Mathew Naismith
This post came about through a discussion with another person
in regards to scientist Robert Lanza and his theory of biocentrism which supports
a consciousness existing outside of the human mind. What I have done is relate subjective
consciousness to active intentions and objective consciousness to passive intentions.
This post will probably be a little too
heavy for anyone who is only into passive intentions.
Extract: “Humans use aesthetic rules for defining truths,
including what is good and evil, what is moral and immoral. Common rules
include conditions of beauty, symmetry, color, tone (light versus dark),
fashion and order.
Even if the rules were valid, it would mean truth is
subjective. If truth is beautiful, your definition of what is beautiful differs
from others' definitions. Further, an individual's perception of beauty changes
with time and experience. A culture's perception of beauty changes with time.
Compare the depictions of the desirable feminine body from 1450, 1850, 1950 and
this year.
Cultural definitions of 'objective truth' are formed by
cultural sensibilities, including fashion, politics, gender, race, beauty,
geography, self interest, desire for social order, etc. There is no indication
these are identifiers of objective truth, or are even related, but they are
still used as criterion.”
It is obvious that physical subjective thought/consciousness
creates realities either that be created through active or passive intentions,
would not a non-physical consciousness also be able to create such realities?
Let’s ask another question to define this; can a reality be
created without a subjective consciousness when we have physically proven, through
our own human intentions, that you can create realities through subjective thinking/consciousness?
Try creating a reality without
subjective consciousness; it’s virtually impossible as I will explain further.
Now let’s see where passive and active intentions fit with
objective and subjective consciousness.
Passive intentions are about intentions that are not forceful
and domineering, this means passive intentions are more about objective consciousness.
If we tried to create a reality based primarily on objective consciousness, it
wouldn’t evolve because of it’s passive nature. To force an action you need subjective consciousness
to do this. This however doesn’t mean
objective consciousness doesn’t play a part in creating a reality; the
objective consciousness gives a bases for subjective consciousness to create
from.
For an example; actual spiritualists don’t express active intentions,
they are very objective within their consciousness, it’s the interactions of
other consciousness’s that are subjectively responding to such spiritual people
that cause an effect. If this objective spiritualist
was totally on their own, they couldn’t create any kind of reality without
subjective intentions.
It is obvious going
by this that passive intentions or more of objective consciousness and active intentions
are more of subjective consciousness.
This means even though objective intentions are the bases
for creation, they actually don’t create themselves, creation obviously comes
from subjective intentions.
Now what type of reality are these subjective intentions
going to create? This depends on our
active and/or passive intentions, a more active intention is going to create
more change but passive intentions are just going to go with the flow of life not
against it. Passive intentions actually mean making less changes to the
environment as a whole including ourselves.
Take a science discovery for example; they are supposed to
be produced by an objective consciousness without an intention, as soon as this
discovery has an intention, it becomes subjective. At this point it can either become passive or
active within it’s intentions, in other words destructive or constructive, the
atom bomb is a good example of a subjective intention becoming destructive. To create anything from objective consciousness
you need a subjective consciousness to do so no matter what.
Objective consciousness is just sitting there for any subjective consciousness to create from, it's motionless until we give it intentions, in other words motion to create.
No comments:
Post a Comment