Written by Mathew Naismith
It is interesting when someone throws a spanner in the works
what comes of it, this is but another example of that. Becoming spiritually aware throws a lot of
spanners into the works which of course makes us more aware if we are able to
remove such spanners. Spanners in this case refer to attachments at the human
& sometimes soul level.
frequencytuner
This thread is
intended to stimulate each person to analyze their own individual thought
patterns and behaviors and accept them, not project them onto others. The very
things we do not like about others, the things that annoy and irritate us are
candid examples of the very nature we carry within ourselves and refuse to
accept about ourselves. If we are standing in front of a mirror and notice we
have a big pimple, we might try to hide it and as a result point out the same
flaw we see on another person's face simply to draw the attention to their flaw
and away from yours. Yet in reality their flaw is yours: accept it.
G'day frequencytuner
I would agree with
this assumption however what if we don't like something that we deem as immoral
within ourselves & dislike this same trait in others especially when they
project this onto us, are we still supposed to accept this? If we don't accept this in ourselves why
should we accept this in others?
A child molester will
accept another child molester molesting children but a non-child molester
won't, should the non-child molester be accepting of what these child molesters
do? When child molesters get together they see nothing wrong with loving
children the way they do & yes I have dealt with child molesters while
working in the welfare arena.
You’re going to see
this as being odd but I never showed my disdain while dealing with these
people, yes I was accepting but this wasn't being accepting of what they were
doing but accepting because I could understand their predicament not saying it
was right just saying I could understand.
This is like I can understand people like Dusty who deductively reason
however on sites like this one you expect people to act in a more respectful
understanding way.
At the spiritual level
we are supposed to be all accepting so a child molester is accepted as of
everything is however at the human level for change to take effect we need to
be non-accepting of certain traits. Being spiritually accepting within it's
totality is also accepting in not being accepting at times as well. This is
like spiritually aware people being non-accepting of the ego because they can
only see the destructive attributes of the ego, this is very human however
spirituality isn't just about the human self so when we look at the ego at the
spiritual level we see it as something different & become more accepting of
it just like the child molester. We need change at the human level so by
becoming non-accepting change physically & mentally takes effect.
It's OK to be
non-accepting at the human level however at the spiritual level it's not which
is what I think your trying to portray here but at the human level however at
the spiritual level it's still OK not to be accepting because all is accepted
including being non-accepting. All it takes is awareness to know the difference
between our human selves & our spiritual selves. It would seem a lot of spiritually
aware people haven't defined this difference yet for the main reason they are
still trying to be at one while still fragmented. Once you become accepting
within it's totality, including being non-accepting at the human level,
only then can we be truly at one & all accepting.
I’m adding a bit more to this post to explain the last
paragraph a little better just in case it sounds a little confusing.
At the spiritual level there is no true non-acceptance even when
we are non-accepting at the spiritual level. This non-acceptance at the
spiritual level isn’t actually referring to our spiritual selves being
non-accepting but our human selves being non-accepting, this is why I said non-acceptance
isn’t accepted/exists at the spiritual level. When we entered into the human vessel non-acceptance became an automatic part of
our being, at this point our soul selves
also became accepting of non-acceptance which has now given the soul a chance
to become accepting within it’s totality through experiencing non-accepting.
I should mention here there is a difference between our
spiritual selves & our soul self, the spiritual self to me relates to the
collective consciousness however the soul relates more to the individual. This can
be confusing; we are talking about the human self, the soul self & the
spiritual self. The spiritual self actually pertains to the self as being a
collective where’s the human & soul self pertains to an individual self. Yes I know the self denotes ego but as soon as
we become aware of ourselves being aware this is denoting ego, the difference
between this kind of ego & the ego we often portray in human life is one is
a controlling destructive ego the other is a non-controlling creative ego I
believe.
If you are interested & are still having problems in
understanding this please feel free to reply.
No comments:
Post a Comment