Written by Mathew Naismith
I recently attended one of my nieces weddings & directly
seated opposite of me at the reception was a lesbian couple, one of the women
was a teacher & the other a psychologist & of course we hit it off
quite well because I once had a job tutoring people with all sorts of disabilities
from anxiety/depression to total physical inabilities & I love psychiatry
so we had a fair bit to talk about. Later on in the night their child awoke &
they brought him over to meet me, well he flawed me, you could literally see
the inner beauty immediately. This wasn’t a normal child because I’ve experienced
this once before in my life with another person. So the question is, was he
expressing this inner beauty because he was with a lesbian couple or was it
because he could express he’s own feminine self? You would have to in this case
answer yes to both these question however!!
Some years ago I was living in a caravan park & a straight
couple arrived at the park, being a small park I met up with them quite quickly.
I got 10ft of the bloke & immediately had to take a couple of steps back,
he blew me away. I immediately recognised he’s soul as being very beautiful
just like the child of the lesbian couple. Latter on I found out he was a male
nurse. Don’t get me wrong these people aren’t particularly drop dead gorgeous
but they had that feeling about them plus there expression oozed feminine, they
were allowed to be expressive of their feminine self which a lot of males aren’t
allowed to do. The problem, which I also
had to contend with at times, is if you expressed any form of femininity especially
at a certain age you were accused of being gay in some way. The other problem
is for the bloke expressing such feminine tendencies, they usually query themselves
of being gay or not because they are so expressive of such feminine tendencies.
The answer of course is not necessarily so & believe me this is a very hard
time for blokes who want to be more expressive of their feminine selves in such
a mescaline run world. We live in a society, especially when I was growing up,
that blokes are blokes & should act accordingly & of course this stifles
one’s own expressive will to express the feminine self by other who are more expressive
of their mescaline selves. I should mention here that mescaline denotes
dominance & aggression, feminine denotes love & nurturing.
According to the Mayans & a few other cultures &
belief systems we are now entering into the feminine cycle of mankind &
leaving the more dominant aggressive masculine cycle behind us, could you
imagine being brought up in a loving nurturing society like this? That I believe
is what is happening. We have more gay men being more expressive of their femininity
because of this shift & eventually I predict we will actually see less gay
men about in years to come because women won’t expect their men to be like macho
mescaline men but expressive of their own free will. We are conditioned from birth to be & act
in a certain ways & anything that expresses anything away from this is labelled
as something untoward or unsavoury in some way, that I believe is changing. Men
will be able to freely express themselves without being labelled as a gay &
inturn these men won’t label themselves as being gay either but just a feminine
male person being expressive of their feminine self which we all have in us, what
a world that will build.
As the dominant mescaline self of man becomes less &
less dominant the famine self of mankind will………No not become dominant but
loving & nurturing!! This might sound like it’ a play on wards, anything
that dominates another thing has to be dominant but only because we are brought
up to believe this to be so. Mescaline is
the opposite of feminine so the outcome of such influences would also have to
be of the opposite; mescaline denotes dominance so therefore the opposite
meaning of dominance is weakness & weakness means being meek, the meek
shall inherit the Earth.
What seems like weakness in some isn’t in others like to be
other than a mucho man is seen to some as a weakness but once you take or lesson
these mucho mescaline aggressive human dominating tendencies what does meek
then pertain to? Meek becomes but another human tendency that’s all, it’s
neither no longer pertains to weakness. There is another way of looking at
this, is it weak for a male person in particular to express their gay &/or
feminine tendencies in an aggressive intolerant macho world? To express any
part of oneself that is not tolerated in such an aggressive world isn’t weak to
me but courageous not weak or meek at all so when the bible says the meek shall inherit
the world it didn’t mean it literally. We must remember here that the bible was
written in the masculine human cycle of man so meekness is going to pertain to weakness
however now we are entering into the feminine cycle of mankind weakness or
meekness won’t have the same meanings because of the conscious change within this
feminine cycle so this mean this little boy I first mentioned in this post will
be able to express his feminine self how he freely wills. I wouldn’t doubt it
one bit if the soul of this little boy didn’t purposely choose a lesbian couple
so he can be as expressive of himself as he wants not what someone else wants unlike
we have had in the last mescaline dominated cycle of mankind.
No comments:
Post a Comment